HR6563-119

In Committee

Terrorist Watchlist Modification Review Act

119th Congress Introduced Dec 10, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Terrorist Watchlist Modification Review Act gives Congress recurring oversight of changes to federal watchlist policy. The FBI Director must notify the appropriate congressional committees within 30 days after any material change to a policy or procedure governing the terrorist watchlist or transnational organized crime watchlist, including changes to adding or removing people. Each notice must summarize the material changes. Within 30 days after a request from an appropriate committee, the FBI Director must provide all current guidance governing use of either watchlist. Separately, by January 31, 2026, and annually for two years, the FBI Director must report on known or presumed United States persons on the terrorist watchlist. The report must provide January 1 and December 31 totals, no-fly and selectee-list counts, exception-to-reasonable-suspicion counts, suspected terrorist-organization affiliations, and each federal agency that nominated United States persons with counts by agency. Appropriate committees include intelligence, appropriations, judiciary, homeland security, and homeland security and governmental affairs committees.

Who Benefits and How

Congressional intelligence, judiciary, appropriations, and homeland-security committees benefit from prompt notice of watchlist policy changes and access to governing guidance. United States persons on the terrorist watchlist benefit indirectly from oversight of nomination, removal, no-fly, selectee, and exception categories. Civil-liberties advocates benefit from aggregate reporting that reveals how many United States persons are affected. Federal agencies that nominate people to watchlists benefit from clearer accountability around nomination counts.

Who Bears the Burden and How

FBI watchlist policy staff must prepare change notices within 30 days, produce governing guidance on committee request, and compile annual reports for two years. Federal nominating agencies must be identifiable in the reports by nomination counts. Congressional committee staff must review sensitive watchlist notices and guidance. Watchlist program managers must track categories such as no-fly, selectee, and exception-to-reasonable-suspicion placements.

Key Provisions

  • Requires FBI notice to Congress within 30 days after material terrorist-watchlist or organized-crime-watchlist policy changes.
  • Requires FBI production of current watchlist guidance within 30 days after a committee request.
  • Requires annual reports for two years on known or presumed United States persons on the terrorist watchlist.
  • Requires reporting of no-fly, selectee, reasonable-suspicion-exception, terrorist-organization-affiliation, and nominating-agency counts.
  • Defines the covered watchlists, United States person, and appropriate congressional committees.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Requires FBI notice to Congress within 30 days of material terrorist-watchlist or transnational-organized-crime-watchlist policy changes, production of governing guidance on request, and annual two-year reports on United States persons on the terrorist watchlist.

Key Policy Areas

National Security, Civil Liberties, Congressional Oversight

Primary Purpose

Requires FBI notice to Congress within 30 days of material terrorist-watchlist or transnational-organized-crime-watchlist policy changes, production of governing guidance on request, and annual two-year reports on United States persons on the terrorist watchlist.

Policy Domains

National Security Civil Liberties Congressional Oversight

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Congressional intelligence committees
  • Congressional judiciary committees
  • Congressional appropriations committees
  • Congressional homeland-security committees
  • United States persons on the watchlist
  • Civil-liberties advocates
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Civil-liberties advocates: ,
Congressional judiciary committees: ,
Congressional intelligence committees: ,
United States persons on the watchlist: ,
Congressional appropriations committees: ,
Congressional homeland-security committees: ,
Identified Costs
  • FBI watchlist policy staff
  • Federal nominating agencies
  • Congressional committee staff
  • Watchlist program managers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
FBI watchlist policy staff: ,
Watchlist program managers: ,
Federal nominating agencies: ,
Congressional committee staff: ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Dec 10, 2025

Mr. Castro of Texas introduced the following bill; which was …

Dec 10, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Dec 10, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
8 mentions across 2 clauses
+4 positive -4 negative

Congressional homeland-security committees, Congressional intelligence committees, Congressional judiciary committees

Positive-direction: Congressional homeland-security committees, Congressional intelligence committees, Congressional judiciary committees

Negative-direction: FBI watchlist policy staff, FBI watchlist reporting staff, Federal nominating agencies, Watchlist program managers

Non-Profit Institutions
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Civil-liberties advocates

General Public
1 mention across 1 clause
?1 uncertain

United States persons on the watchlist

2/3
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
National Security Civil Liberties Congressional Oversight
Actor Mappings
"agencies"
→ ['Federal Bureau of Investigation']
"committees"
→ ['Congressional intelligence committees', 'Congressional judiciary committees']

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology