HR6556-119

Reported

Failing Bank Acquisition Fairness Act

119th Congress Introduced Dec 10, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Failing Bank Acquisition Fairness Act limits when regulators can let already-large banking organizations acquire failed or failing institutions despite statutory concentration limits. It amends the Bank Merger Act, FDIC receivership provisions, and Bank Holding Company Act exceptions so default, danger-of-default, and FDIC-assisted acquisitions can use concentration-limit exceptions only when the responsible agency finds by clear and convincing evidence that the acquisition is necessary to prevent significant economic disruption or adverse financial-stability effects.

The bill also bars those exceptions when FDIC has received a qualified bid from an institution that is not prohibited by the concentration limits. A qualified bid requires the company and its affiliates to be well capitalized and well managed and the resulting depository institution to be well capitalized. When the Federal Reserve, OCC, or FDIC waives concentration limits for default or FDIC-assisted transactions, the waiving agency and FDIC must report to the House Financial Services Committee and Senate Banking Committee within 30 days, explain the justification, identify alternative bids and outcomes, explain why alternatives were not selected, and make the report public subject to redactions. FDIC may not count bids that would violate concentration limits when making its least-cost Deposit Insurance Fund determination.

Who Benefits and How

Regional bank bidders benefit because large-bank concentration exceptions become harder to use when a qualified non-prohibited bid exists. Community banks benefit if failed-bank sales are less likely to default to the largest acquirers. Deposit Insurance Fund stakeholders benefit if regulators must justify why concentration-limit waivers are necessary and why alternatives were rejected. Congressional banking committees benefit from prompt reports on waived concentration limits. Banking-market competitors benefit from rules designed to preserve competition in emergency acquisitions.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Federal Reserve merger staff must make and document clear-and-convincing necessity determinations before concentration-limit exceptions are used. OCC licensing staff must apply the same test for covered national-bank transactions. FDIC resolution staff must evaluate qualified non-prohibited bids, join waiver reports, and ignore bad-faith concentration-violating bids in least-cost analysis. Large banking organizations near concentration limits bear a burden because their bids are less usable in failed-bank acquisitions. Treasury and financial-stability officials may have fewer emergency acquisition paths when a qualified smaller bidder exists.

Key Provisions

  • Tightens concentration-limit exceptions for default and danger-of-default bank mergers.
  • Requires clear and convincing evidence that a covered acquisition is necessary to prevent significant economic disruption or adverse financial-stability effects.
  • Bars exceptions when FDIC has received a qualified bid from a non-prohibited institution.
  • Defines qualified bid using well-capitalized and well-managed standards for the bidder and affiliates.
  • Requires the waiving agency and FDIC to report to congressional banking committees within 30 days.
  • Requires public waiver reports with justification, alternatives, reasons for rejecting alternatives, and competition recommendations.
  • Excludes concentration-violating bids from FDIC least-cost Deposit Insurance Fund determinations.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Tightens default and failing-bank acquisition exceptions to banking concentration limits by requiring clear-and-convincing necessity findings, barring exceptions when a qualified non-prohibited bidder exists, requiring public reports when concentration limits are waived, and excluding concentration-violating bids from FDIC least-cost calculations.

Key Policy Areas

Banking, Financial Stability, Bank Mergers, FDIC Resolution

Primary Purpose

Tightens default and failing-bank acquisition exceptions to banking concentration limits by requiring clear-and-convincing necessity findings, barring exceptions when a qualified non-prohibited bidder exists, requiring public reports when concentration limits are waived, and excluding concentration-violating bids from FDIC least-cost calculations.

Policy Domains

Banking Financial Stability Bank Mergers FDIC Resolution

House resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Regional bank bidders
  • Community banks
  • Deposit Insurance Fund stakeholders
  • Congressional banking committees
  • Banking-market competitors
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh
Community banks: , ,
Regional bank bidders: , ,
Banking-market competitors: , ,
Congressional banking committees: , ,
Deposit Insurance Fund stakeholders: , ,
Identified Costs
  • Federal Reserve merger staff
  • OCC licensing staff
  • FDIC resolution staff
  • Large banking organizations near concentration limits
  • Treasury financial-stability officials
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh
OCC licensing staff: , ,
FDIC resolution staff: , ,
Federal Reserve merger staff: , ,
Treasury financial-stability officials: , ,
Large banking organizations near concentration limits: , ,

Legislative Progress

Reported
Introduced Committee Passed
Feb 2, 2026

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 406.

Feb 2, 2026

Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. …

Feb 2, 2026

Additional sponsor: Mr. Gottheimer

Feb 2, 2026

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the …

Dec 17, 2025

Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: …

Dec 17, 2025

Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

Dec 16, 2025

Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

Dec 10, 2025

Introduced in House

Dec 10, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

Dec 10, 2025

Mr. Lynch introduced the following bill; which was referred to …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Financial Services
18 mentions across 9 clauses
+12 positive -6 negative

Community bank competitors, Community banks, Large banking organizations near concentration limits

Positive-direction: Community bank competitors, Community banks, Regional bank bidders

Negative-direction: Large banking organizations near concentration limits

Bank Regulators
15 mentions across 9 clauses
-15 negative

FDIC resolution staff, OCC licensing staff

Federal Reserve
6 mentions across 6 clauses
-6 negative

Federal Reserve merger staff

Congressional Committees
6 mentions across 3 clauses
+6 positive

House Financial Services Committee members, Senate Banking Committee members

Bank Regulation
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+3 positive

Deposit Insurance Fund stakeholders

4/4
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Banking Financial Stability Bank Mergers FDIC Resolution
Actor Mappings
"fed"
→ Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
"occ"
→ Comptroller of the Currency
"fdic"
→ Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
"treasury"
→ Secretary of the Treasury

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology