HR6507-119

In Committee

DHS Grants Accountability Act

119th Congress Introduced Dec 9, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The DHS Grants Accountability Act amends Homeland Security Act grant provisions administered through DHS and FEMA. It changes section 2002 so the Administrator must, not less frequently than annually, update terrorism-risk assessments for grant allocations instead of only having discretionary authority. It changes section 2007 so funds are allocated to States or areas on the basis of specified risk factors, and requires annual congressional notification to the House Homeland Security Committee and Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee before the applicable notice of funding opportunity is issued. It also adds grant-timing rules to section 2021 for specified grant programs: each notice of funding opportunity must be publicly available by any appropriations-act deadline, or within 60 days after enactment if no deadline exists; eligible recipients must have at least 30 days after the notice is public to submit applications; and DHS must make grant funds available for recipient use under statutory timing rules. The covered grant universe includes preparedness grants, transit security, port security, urban area security, nonprofit security, and related homeland security assistance streams.

Who Benefits and How

State homeland security agencies benefit from clearer annual risk-based allocation expectations and more predictable grant timelines. Urban areas receiving UASI grants benefit from public NOFO timing and minimum application windows. Transit agencies, port authorities, and railroad operators benefit from more predictable security grant availability. Nonprofit security grant recipients benefit from more accountable funding notices and application windows. Congressional homeland security committees benefit from annual notification before grant allocation notices go out.

Who Bears the Burden and How

DHS and FEMA grant staff must update risk assessments annually, prepare notices on statutory timelines, allow at least 30 days for applications, make funds available on time, and notify Congress before funding opportunity notices. Grant applicants still must prepare applications quickly once notices are published. FEMA may face reduced discretion when allocation factors and congressional notification requirements are specified. Security equipment vendors and grant consultants may see demand, but grant recipients must still justify purchases and comply with program rules.

Key Provisions

  • Requires DHS terrorism-risk assessments for covered grant programs to be updated at least annually.
  • Requires certain preparedness allocations to be based on specified risk factors.
  • Requires annual congressional notification before notices of funding opportunity are issued.
  • Requires public notices of funding opportunity by appropriations deadlines or within 60 days after enactment when no deadline exists.
  • Provides eligible recipients at least 30 days after notice publication to submit applications.
  • Requires grant funds to be made available for recipient use under statutory timing rules.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Tightens DHS preparedness, transit, port, urban-area, nonprofit, and homeland security grant administration by requiring annual terrorism-risk assessment updates, risk-based allocation rules, congressional notification before funding notices, public NOFO deadlines, minimum application windows, faster fund availability, and related accountability rules.

Key Policy Areas

Homeland Security, Grants, Public Safety

Primary Purpose

Tightens DHS preparedness, transit, port, urban-area, nonprofit, and homeland security grant administration by requiring annual terrorism-risk assessment updates, risk-based allocation rules, congressional notification before funding notices, public NOFO deadlines, minimum application windows, faster fund availability, and related accountability rules.

Policy Domains

Homeland Security Grants Public Safety

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • State homeland security agencies
  • Urban areas receiving UASI grants
  • Transit agencies
  • Port authorities
  • Railroad operators
  • Nonprofit security grant recipients
  • Congressional homeland security committees
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Port authorities: ,
Transit agencies: ,
Railroad operators: ,
State homeland security agencies: ,
Urban areas receiving UASI grants: ,
Nonprofit security grant recipients: ,
Congressional homeland security committees: ,
Identified Costs
  • DHS grant staff
  • FEMA grant administrators
  • Grant applicants
  • Security equipment vendors
  • Grant consultants
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
DHS grant staff: ,
Grant applicants: ,
Grant consultants: ,
FEMA grant administrators: ,
Security equipment vendors: ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Feb 2, 2026

Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.

Feb 2, 2026

Referred to the Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation.

Feb 2, 2026

Referred to the Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, and Hazardous Materials.

Dec 10, 2025

Referred to the Subcommittee on Transportation and Maritime Security.

Dec 9, 2025

Mr. Kennedy of New York (for himself and Mr. Thompson …

Dec 9, 2025

Referred to the Committee on Homeland Security, and in addition …

Dec 9, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
3 mentions across 1 clause
+1 positive -2 negative

Congressional homeland security committees, DHS grant staff, FEMA grant administrators

Positive-direction: Congressional homeland security committees

Negative-direction: DHS grant staff, FEMA grant administrators

Transportation
3 mentions across 1 clause
+3 positive

Port authorities, Railroad operators, Transit agencies

State & Local Government
2 mentions across 1 clause
+2 positive

State homeland security agencies, Urban areas receiving UASI grants

Non-Profit Institutions
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Nonprofit security grant recipients

2/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Homeland Security Grants Public Safety

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology