HR6494-118

Reported

To amend title 49, United States Code, to provide enhanced safety in pipeline transportation, and for other purposes.

118th Congress Introduced Nov 29, 2023

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

Reauthorizes and increases funding for federal pipeline safety programs covering gas and hazardous liquid pipelines. Authorizes $181-207M annually through FY2027.

Who Benefits and How

  • Pipeline safety receives increased federal investment
  • State pipeline programs receive grant funding
  • Public safety strengthened through enhanced oversight

Who Bears the Burden and How

  • Pipeline operators fund programs through fees
  • PHMSA administers expanded safety programs
  • Industry faces continued regulatory oversight

Key Provisions

  • Authorization from $181M (FY24) to $207M (FY27)
  • $9M annually for Pipeline Safety Information Grants
  • $73-79M annually for state grants
  • Covers gas and hazardous liquid pipeline provisions

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Reauthorizes pipeline safety programs with increased funding through FY2027

Who Benefits

  • Pipeline safety
  • State programs
  • Public safety

Who Bears Costs

  • Pipeline operators
  • PHMSA
  • Industry

Key Policy Areas

Pipeline Safety, Energy, Transportation

Primary Purpose

Reauthorizes pipeline safety programs with increased funding through FY2027

Policy Domains

Pipeline Safety Energy Transportation

Legislative Strategy

"Continue pipeline safety oversight with increased resources"

Legislative Progress

Reported
Introduced Committee Passed
Dec 16, 2024

Reported from the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure with an …

Dec 16, 2024

Committee on Energy and Commerce discharged; committed to the Committee …

Nov 29, 2023

Mr. Graves of Missouri (for himself, Mr. Larsen of Washington, …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Oil & Gas
20 mentions across 20 clauses
+13 positive -7 negative

Carbon dioxide pipeline operators, LNG facility operators, Natural gas pipeline operators

Pipeline operators faces effects in multiple directions

Positive-direction: LNG facility operators, Natural gas pipeline operators, Natural gas pipeline operators exploring hydrogen blending, Pipeline industry stakeholders, Pipeline operators facing large penalties, Pipeline operators seeking waivers, Pipeline operators with alternative maintenance methods, Pipeline operators with breakout tanks

Negative-direction: Carbon dioxide pipeline operators, Operators of idled pipelines, Pipeline integrity management programs, Pipeline operators in changing class locations, Pipeline operators in geohazard areas

Government
18 mentions across 17 clauses
+3 positive -15 negative

Federal agencies regulating LNG, GAO, PHMSA Office of Pipeline Safety

PHMSA Office of Pipeline Safety faces effects in multiple directions

Positive-direction: PHMSA pipeline safety programs, Pipeline safety engineers and scientists

Negative-direction: Federal agencies regulating LNG, GAO, PHMSA class location program, PHMSA data collection, PHMSA enforcement programs, PHMSA grant programs, PHMSA public engagement, PHMSA regulatory programs, PHMSA rulemaking programs, PHMSA special permit program, PHMSA standards program, PHMSA technical committees

State & Local Government
7 mentions across 7 clauses
+6 positive -1 negative

Communities near CO2 pipelines, Communities near pipelines, State one-call programs

Positive-direction: Communities near CO2 pipelines, Communities near pipelines, State pipeline safety programs

Negative-direction: State one-call programs

Research & Science
4 mentions across 4 clauses
+4 positive

Industry standards organizations, National Academies, Small and mid-sized universities (under 15,000 enrollment)

Renewable Energy
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

Hydrogen energy industry, Hydrogen pipeline developers

Environment
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

Carbon capture and sequestration projects, Carbon capture projects

Construction
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Excavators near pipelines

General Public
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Pipeline vandals and saboteurs

34/34
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Pipeline Safety Energy
Actor Mappings
"the_secretary"
→ Secretary of Transportation

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology