HR6465-119

In Committee

HALT Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Dec 4, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The bill combines a policy statement with a funding restriction. Its findings cite the New START extension, the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty verification network, Stockpile Stewardship, Russian threats after the invasion of Ukraine, and nuclear modernization by Russia, China, India, Pakistan, and North Korea. The policy section says the United States should lead negotiations on arms-control, disarmament, and risk-reduction agreements, including renewed United States-Russia inspections, a verifiable freeze on testing, production, and deployment, numerical ceilings on delivery systems and warheads, no-first-use policies or declaratory transparency, expanded IAEA access through the Security Council, limits on launch-on-warning posture, protections for nuclear command and control, hypersonic transparency, nuclear stockpile data exchanges, a fissile-material cutoff treaty, head-of-state nuclear summits, CTBT ratification, and restraint on new warhead designs. The operative funding section bars fiscal year 2026 and later funds, plus unobligated prior funds, from being used for any explosive nuclear weapons test that produces yield unless the President submits a stockpile-condition addendum and Congress enacts a joint resolution approving the test. Zero-yield stockpile stewardship is not limited.

Who Benefits and How

Arms-control advocates, nuclear-risk reduction organizations, and communities concerned about nuclear testing benefit from a statutory preference for negotiated freezes and a congressional approval requirement before yield-producing tests. Congress benefits by gaining a veto point over explosive nuclear testing. International nonproliferation institutions benefit if the United States pursues CTBT ratification, fissile-material limits, IAEA access, and data exchanges.

Who Bears the Burden and How

The Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration, Department of Defense, and any nuclear-test planners are barred from obligating funds for yield-producing tests unless the President files the required addendum and Congress approves a joint resolution. The President must justify any stockpile-condition change before testing. Diplomatic agencies would need to pursue a broad arms-control agenda if the policy is implemented.

Key Provisions

  • States United States policy to pursue multilateral nuclear arms-control, disarmament, and risk-reduction negotiations.
  • Directs policy attention to New START follow-on measures, nuclear-freeze agreements, warhead and delivery-system ceilings, no-first-use policy, IAEA access, NC3 protections, hypersonic transparency, and fissile-material limits.
  • Encourages CTBT ratification and reciprocal commitments not to develop new nuclear warhead or bomb designs.
  • Bars funds for explosive nuclear weapons tests with yield until the President submits a stockpile-condition addendum and Congress enacts a joint resolution approving the test.
  • Protects zero-yield stockpile stewardship activities from the funding bar.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

States a United States policy favoring multilateral nuclear-arms reduction and freeze negotiations, and bars funding for explosive nuclear-weapons testing with yield unless the President submits a stockpile-condition addendum and Congress approves the test by joint resolution.

Key Policy Areas

Defense, Foreign Affairs, Nuclear Nonproliferation

Primary Purpose

States a United States policy favoring multilateral nuclear-arms reduction and freeze negotiations, and bars funding for explosive nuclear-weapons testing with yield unless the President submits a stockpile-condition addendum and Congress approves the test by joint resolution.

Policy Domains

Defense Foreign Affairs Nuclear Nonproliferation

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Arms-control advocates
  • Nuclear-risk reduction organizations
  • Congress
  • International Atomic Energy Agency
  • Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty institutions
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Congress: , ,
Arms-control advocates: , ,
International Atomic Energy Agency: , ,
Nuclear-risk reduction organizations: , ,
Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty institutions: , ,
Identified Costs
  • Department of Energy
  • National Nuclear Security Administration
  • Department of Defense
  • President
  • Nuclear-test planners
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
President: , ,
Department of Energy: , ,
Department of Defense: , ,
Nuclear-test planners: , ,
National Nuclear Security Administration: , ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Dec 4, 2025

Mr. McGovern (for himself, Mr. Garamendi, and Mr. Beyer) introduced …

Dec 4, 2025

Referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition …

Dec 4, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
3 mentions across 2 clauses
+1 positive -2 negative

Congressional nuclear-oversight committees, President nuclear-test approval process, State Department arms-control negotiators

Positive-direction: Congressional nuclear-oversight committees

Negative-direction: President nuclear-test approval process, State Department arms-control negotiators

Defense
3 mentions across 2 clauses
+1 positive -2 negative

Department of Defense nuclear policy offices, NNSA nuclear-test programs, Zero-yield stockpile stewardship programs

Positive-direction: Zero-yield stockpile stewardship programs

Negative-direction: Department of Defense nuclear policy offices, NNSA nuclear-test programs

General Public
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Arms-control advocates

3/4
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Defense Foreign Affairs Nuclear Nonproliferation

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology