HR6440-119

In Committee

Right to Read Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Dec 4, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Right to Read Act of 2025 amends the Elementary and Secondary Education Act to make school libraries, certified school librarians, digital literacy, information literacy, and student access to reading materials part of federal education policy. It defines an effective school library as one staffed by support staff and at least one full-time State-certified school librarian who is an instructional leader, information specialist, and teacher; is open before, during, and after the school day; has up-to-date digital and print materials and technology; provides facilities, connectivity, and library and literacy instruction; trains teachers and library staff; supports collaboration; and follows national professional standards. Title I changes require State plans to address whether low-income students, minority students, students with disabilities, and English learners are disproportionately enrolled in schools lacking effective libraries, to report progress publicly, to include digital and information literacy in academic standards alignment, and to maintain a right-to-read policy notified to local educational agencies, Indian Tribes, schools, educators, parents, and the public. Local plans must explain how they will support and improve effective school libraries and access. Title II changes authorize $500,000,000 annually for literacy grants and $100,000,000 annually for related grants from FY2026 through FY2030, add school-library support, librarian recruitment and retention, and training for librarians, teachers, leaders, paraprofessionals, and library staff. NCES must collect biennial school-library data and report to Congress. Teachers, school librarians, leaders, paraprofessionals, and staff receive liability protection for actions under right-to-read policies. State and local educational agencies receiving ESEA funds must assure they will protect First Amendment rights in school libraries and equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment and nondiscrimination laws.

Who Benefits and How

Students benefit from stronger access to effective school libraries, varied reading materials, digital literacy, information literacy, and First Amendment protections. Low-income students, minority students, students with disabilities, and English learners benefit from State reporting on disproportionate lack of effective libraries. State-certified school librarians benefit from statutory recognition, recruitment and retention support, training, and liability protection. Teachers, school leaders, paraprofessionals, and library staff benefit from training and liability protections. State and local educational agencies benefit from grant funding for literacy and library programs. Policymakers and library advocates benefit from biennial NCES data.

Who Bears the Burden and How

State educational agencies and local educational agencies must update Title I plans, right-to-read policies, public reporting, parent and public notices, library planning, and constitutional-rights assurances. Schools must support effective library access and may need certified librarians, materials, technology, facilities, training, and collaboration time. NCES and the Education Department must collect biennial data and report to Congress. Federal taxpayers fund $600,000,000 annually in authorized grants plus data collection. School boards must exercise library decisions consistent with First Amendment and equal-protection obligations.

Key Provisions

  • Defines effective school library and requires certified school librarian staffing, materials, technology, access, training, collaboration, and professional standards.
  • Amends Title I State plans to address disproportionate lack of effective libraries for low-income students, minority students, students with disabilities, and English learners.
  • Requires State right-to-read policies and notification to local agencies, Tribes, schools, educators, parents, and the public.
  • Authorizes $500,000,000 annually for literacy grants and $100,000,000 annually for related grants from FY2026 through FY2030.
  • Adds Title II support for school libraries, librarian recruitment and retention, and training for librarians, teachers, school leaders, paraprofessionals, and staff.
  • Requires NCES biennial school-library data collection and congressional reports.
  • Provides liability protections for educators acting under right-to-read policies.
  • Requires constitutional-rights assurances protecting student First Amendment and equal-protection rights in school libraries.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Defines effective school libraries, adds school librarians and right-to-read planning to ESEA Title I and Title II, authorizes $600 million annually for literacy and library grants, requires school-library data collection, creates liability protections, and requires constitutional-rights assurances for school libraries.

Key Policy Areas

Education, Civil Rights, Libraries, Literacy

Primary Purpose

Defines effective school libraries, adds school librarians and right-to-read planning to ESEA Title I and Title II, authorizes $600 million annually for literacy and library grants, requires school-library data collection, creates liability protections, and requires constitutional-rights assurances for school libraries.

Policy Domains

Education Civil Rights Libraries Literacy

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Students
  • Low-income students
  • Minority students
  • Students with disabilities
  • English learners
  • State-certified school librarians
  • Teachers
  • School leaders
  • State educational agencies
  • Local educational agencies
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Students: , , , , ,
Teachers: , , , , ,
School leaders: , , , , ,
English learners: , , , , ,
Minority students: , , , , ,
Low-income students: , , , , ,
Local educational agencies: , , , , ,
State educational agencies: , , , , ,
Students with disabilities: , , , , ,
State-certified school librarians: , , , , ,
Identified Costs
  • State educational agencies
  • Local educational agencies
  • School boards
  • NCES data staff
  • Education Department administrators
  • Federal taxpayers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
School boards: , , , , ,
NCES data staff: , , , , ,
Federal taxpayers: , , , , ,
Local educational agencies: , , , , ,
State educational agencies: , , , , ,
Education Department administrators: , , , , ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Dec 4, 2025

Mrs. Grijalva (for herself, Mrs. Beatty, Ms. Bonamici, and Ms. …

Dec 4, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.

Dec 4, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Education
29 mentions across 7 clauses
+22 positive -7 negative

Classroom teachers, Education policymakers, English learners

Local educational agencies faces effects in multiple directions

Positive-direction: Classroom teachers, Education policymakers, English learners, Library paraprofessionals, Low-income students, Minority students, Paraprofessionals, School leaders, School librarians, School library programs, School library staff, State-certified school librarians, Students, Students using school libraries, Students with disabilities, Teachers

Negative-direction: School boards, School systems

State & Local Government
6 mentions across 6 clauses
+1 positive -5 negative

State educational agencies

State educational agencies faces effects in multiple directions

Government
3 mentions across 3 clauses
-3 negative

Education Department administrators, NCES data staff

Taxpayers
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

Taxpayers

General Public
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Potential plaintiffs

Tribal Nations
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Indian Tribes

Non-Profit Institutions
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

School library advocates

7/9
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Education Civil Rights Libraries Literacy

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology