STOP Scams Against Seniors Act
Summary
What This Bill Does
The STOP Scams Against Seniors Act amends the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act Byrne grant program. It adds establishment, operation, and implementation of elder justice task forces as an allowable grant purpose when those task forces address financial exploitation, scams, and fraud primarily targeting people who are 60 or older. Task forces may include or coordinate with State and local law enforcement agencies, prosecutors, adult protective services professionals, and federal agencies including the FBI, FTC, DOJ, and Secret Service. Grant recipients using funds for this purpose must report the number of cases initiated, the number fully investigated and brought to conclusion, the number of fraud victims receiving support, legal assistance, or restitution, the type of scam and initial-contact method for each victim and case, and any indicator of organized or transnational criminal involvement. The Attorney General must submit an annual report to the House and Senate Judiciary Committees summarizing the recipient information.
Who Benefits and How
Older adults targeted by scams benefit because Byrne funds can support specialized elder justice task forces focused on financial exploitation, fraud, and scams. State and local law enforcement agencies, prosecutors, and adult protective services professionals benefit from a new grant-supported use for coordinated senior-scam investigations. Fraud victims may benefit from support, legal assistance, or restitution tracked by the reporting rules. Congress benefits from annual DOJ reporting on case outcomes, scam methods, victim support, and organized or transnational criminal indicators.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Byrne grant recipients must collect detailed task-force metrics and report them in addition to other grant reporting. The Attorney General and DOJ grant officials must compile the information and report annually to Judiciary Committees. State and local task forces must track scam type, contact method, victim assistance, and organized-crime indicators. Federal taxpayers fund grant-supported task-force work.
Key Provisions
- Amends Byrne grant purposes to include elder justice task forces for scams, fraud, and financial exploitation targeting people age 60 or older.
- Allows task forces to include or coordinate with law enforcement, prosecutors, adult protective services, FBI, FTC, DOJ, and Secret Service.
- Requires recipient reports on initiated cases, completed investigations, victim support, legal assistance, restitution, scam type, contact method, and organized-crime indicators.
- Requires the Attorney General to submit an annual summary report to House and Senate Judiciary Committees.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Adds elder justice task forces addressing scams, fraud, and financial exploitation of people age 60 or older as an allowed Byrne grant use and requires task-force case, victim, scam-method, and organized-crime reporting to DOJ and Congress.
Key Policy Areas
Law Enforcement, Consumer Protection, Aging, Justice
Primary Purpose
Adds elder justice task forces addressing scams, fraud, and financial exploitation of people age 60 or older as an allowed Byrne grant use and requires task-force case, victim, scam-method, and organized-crime reporting to DOJ and Congress.
Policy Domains
Substantive provisions
Identified Gains
- Older adults targeted by scams
- State law enforcement agencies
- Local law enforcement agencies
- Adult protective services professionals
- Fraud victims
- Congressional judiciary committees
Identified Costs
- Byrne grant recipients
- DOJ grant officials
- Attorney General
- Elder justice task forces
- Federal taxpayers
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
In CommitteeMr. Amo (for himself, Mr. Shreve, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, …
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Introduced in House
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Byrne grant recipients, Local law enforcement agencies, State law enforcement agencies
Positive-direction: Local law enforcement agencies, State law enforcement agencies
Negative-direction: Byrne grant recipients
Attorney General, Congressional judiciary committees, DOJ grant officials
Positive-direction: Congressional judiciary committees
Negative-direction: Attorney General, DOJ grant officials
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology