Myakka Wild and Scenic River Act of 2025
Summary
What This Bill Does
The Myakka Wild and Scenic River Act of 2025 builds on prior federal study and Florida protection of the Myakka River. The findings state that a prior Wild and Scenic Rivers Act study found the river eligible, Florida protected it through the Myakka River Wild and Scenic Designation and Protection Act, Sarasota County and the cities of Venice and North Port protected the river through land-use plans and ordinances, and the Myakka River Management Coordinating Council endorsed designation. The operative section defines the Myakka River, Council, comprehensive management plan, and Secretary; treats the existing Myakka River Wild and Scenic Management Plan as satisfying the federal comprehensive management plan requirement; lets Interior coordinate administration and enter cooperative agreements with Florida DEP Division of Recreation and Parks, Sarasota County, North Port, Venice, local planning bodies, and nonprofits; clarifies that cooperative administration does not make the river a National Park System unit or trigger National Park Service administration; preserves management authority over public and private lands in the watershed; authorizes technical assistance, staff support, and funding for updating and implementing the plan; and limits land acquisition to donation or willing-seller acquisition while prohibiting condemnation.
Who Benefits and How
Myakka River conservation efforts benefit because federal recognition, technical assistance, staff support, and funding can reinforce the State and local management plan. Florida DEP, Sarasota County, North Port, Venice, and the Myakka River Management Coordinating Council benefit because cooperative agreements let existing local institutions remain central. River users, ecotourism businesses, and conservation nonprofits benefit from long-term preservation of the river corridor. Private landowners benefit from the explicit bar on condemnation and the requirement that federal acquisition happen only by donation or consent.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Interior must coordinate administration, negotiate cooperative agreements, provide technical assistance or funding if available, and respect limits on land acquisition. State and local partners must coordinate plan updates and implementation. Some development interests near the watershed may face continued conservation-oriented planning constraints under the State and local framework. Federal taxpayers may fund technical assistance, staff support, or plan implementation.
Key Provisions
- Finds that the Myakka River was studied and determined eligible for the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System.
- Recognizes Florida, Sarasota County, Venice, North Port, public supporters, and the Myakka River Management Coordinating Council as supporting protection.
- Treats the existing Myakka River Wild and Scenic Management Plan as the federal comprehensive management plan.
- Authorizes Interior cooperative agreements with Florida, local governments, planning bodies, and nonprofits.
- Provides that cooperative administration does not make the river a National Park System unit.
- Authorizes technical assistance, staff support, and funding for management-plan implementation.
- Limits land acquisition to donation or owner consent and prohibits condemnation.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Designates Myakka River segments in Florida for Wild and Scenic Rivers Act treatment through cooperative administration, recognizes the State management plan, limits federal land acquisition to donation or owner consent, and bars condemnation.
Key Policy Areas
Public Lands, Environment, State & Local Government, Tourism
Primary Purpose
Designates Myakka River segments in Florida for Wild and Scenic Rivers Act treatment through cooperative administration, recognizes the State management plan, limits federal land acquisition to donation or owner consent, and bars condemnation.
Policy Domains
Substantive provisions
Identified Gains
- Myakka River conservation programs
- Florida DEP Division of Recreation and Parks
- Sarasota County
- City of North Port
- City of Venice
- Conservation nonprofits
- Private landowners
- River recreation users
Identified Costs
- Interior Department river program staff
- State park managers
- Local planning officials
- Watershed development interests
- Federal taxpayers
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
In CommitteeMr. Steube (for himself and Mr. Buchanan) introduced the following …
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Introduced in House
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
City of North Port, City of Venice, Florida DEP park managers
Private landowners, Watershed development interests
Positive-direction: Private landowners
Negative-direction: Watershed development interests
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology