HR641-119

In Committee

Coordination for Soil Carbon Research and Monitoring Act

119th Congress Introduced Jan 23, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Coordination for Soil Carbon Research and Monitoring Act establishes an Interagency Committee on Soil Carbon Research led by the Office of Science and Technology Policy. The committee includes USDA, DOE, Interior, EPA, USGS, NOAA, NSF, NASA, the White House Environmental Justice Advisory Council, NIST, and any other agency OSTP adds. It must develop a cross-agency strategic plan for soil carbon sequestration sampling, measurement methods, monitoring technologies, and community needs; propose agency roles and responsibilities; oversee working groups; consult with agencies and OMB on planning and budget review; submit a baseline report to Congress within one year; and send progress reports at one, three, and five years after that baseline report. The bill also requires coordination on soil carbon monitoring, greenhouse-gas flux data, long-term storage protocols, standardized reporting, and review by soil science experts from academia, private industry, and nonprofits representing geographic, operational, and demographic diversity in U.S. agriculture.

Who Benefits and How

Farmers and ranchers benefit if federal soil carbon measurement methods become more consistent and credible for conservation, climate, and possible market programs. Soil scientists, universities, private monitoring firms, and nonprofit research organizations benefit from formal consultation and clearer federal research priorities. Federal agencies benefit from a shared plan that reduces duplicative soil carbon monitoring work. Congress benefits from baseline and follow-up reports on agency activity and data gaps.

Who Bears the Burden and How

OSTP must lead a large interagency committee and coordinate budgets, working groups, reports, and expert input. USDA, DOE, Interior, EPA, USGS, NOAA, NSF, NASA, NIST, and environmental justice staff must provide representatives and align soil carbon work. Agencies may need to standardize data and monitoring protocols. Federal taxpayers fund the coordination and reporting work.

Key Provisions

  • Establishes an OSTP-led Interagency Committee on Soil Carbon Research.
  • Requires a cross-agency strategic plan for soil carbon sequestration sampling, measurement, monitoring technologies, and community needs.
  • Directs the committee to propose agency roles, oversee working groups, and coordinate with OMB on planning and budget review.
  • Requires a baseline report to Congress within one year and progress reports at one-, three-, and five-year intervals.
  • Requires coordination on soil carbon data, greenhouse-gas fluxes, long-term storage protocols, standardized reporting, and expert review.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Creates an OSTP-led Interagency Committee on Soil Carbon Research to coordinate federal soil carbon sequestration sampling, measurement, monitoring technology, data reporting, agency roles, working groups, expert consultation, and congressional reports.

Key Policy Areas

Agriculture, Environment, Research, Climate

Primary Purpose

Creates an OSTP-led Interagency Committee on Soil Carbon Research to coordinate federal soil carbon sequestration sampling, measurement, monitoring technology, data reporting, agency roles, working groups, expert consultation, and congressional reports.

Policy Domains

Agriculture Environment Research Climate

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Farmers
  • Ranchers
  • Soil scientists
  • Universities
  • Private monitoring firms
  • Nonprofit research organizations
  • Congressional agriculture committees
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Farmers:
Ranchers:
Universities:
Soil scientists:
Private monitoring firms:
Nonprofit research organizations:
Congressional agriculture committees:
Identified Costs
  • Office of Science and Technology Policy
  • USDA research staff
  • EPA climate staff
  • USGS scientists
  • NOAA scientists
  • NASA researchers
  • NIST measurement experts
  • Federal taxpayers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
NOAA scientists:
USGS scientists:
NASA researchers:
EPA climate staff:
Federal taxpayers:
USDA research staff:
NIST measurement experts:
Office of Science and Technology Policy:

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Feb 28, 2025

Referred to the Subcommittee on Conservation, Research, and Biotechnology.

Jan 23, 2025

Ms. McClellan (for herself, Mr. Lawler, Mr. Sorensen, Ms. Bonamici, …

Jan 23, 2025

Referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, and …

Jan 23, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
3 mentions across 1 clause
-3 negative

EPA climate staff, Office of Science and Technology Policy, USDA research staff

Agriculture
2 mentions across 1 clause
+2 positive

Farmers, Ranchers

Research & Science
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Soil scientists

Education
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Universities

Technology
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Private monitoring firms

Taxpayers
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Taxpayers

1/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Agriculture Environment Research Climate

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology