HR6366-119

In Committee

Boosting the Rural STEM Pipeline Act

119th Congress Introduced Dec 2, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Boosting the Rural STEM Pipeline Act removes cost-sharing from the Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program. It strikes subsection (i) of section 10A of the National Science Foundation Authorization Act of 2002, redesignates the following subsections, and makes conforming amendments to the Research and Development, Competition, and Innovation Act so references to requirements and waivers match the repeal. The practical effect is that universities, teacher-preparation programs, and school-district partners seeking Noyce support would not need to supply a cost share or seek a cost-share waiver. That matters most for rural institutions and smaller STEM teacher pipeline partnerships that may have strong teacher-shortage needs but limited matching funds.

Who Benefits and How

Rural colleges, teacher-preparation programs, STEM education partnerships, and prospective STEM teachers benefit because Noyce proposals become easier to finance without a nonfederal match. Rural school districts benefit if more institutions can participate in Noyce-supported STEM teacher recruitment and preparation. NSF program staff benefit from fewer waiver determinations.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Federal taxpayers bear more of the program cost when nonfederal matching funds are no longer required. NSF grant staff must update guidance, forms, and award administration. Institutions that previously supplied matching funds may see less leverage from their own cost-share commitments, but the main burden shift is from grantees to federal funding.

Key Provisions

  • Repeals the Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program cost-sharing subsection.
  • Redesignates the remaining Noyce statutory subsections after the repeal.
  • Updates Research and Development, Competition, and Innovation Act references from cost-share requirements to a single requirement.
  • Removes repeated waiver references that depended on the old cost-sharing structure.
  • Shifts Noyce participation toward eligibility and program requirements rather than matching-fund capacity.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Repeals cost-sharing requirements for the National Science Foundation Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program and makes conforming amendments so Noyce grants no longer depend on cost-share waiver language.

Key Policy Areas

Education, STEM, Rural Education

Primary Purpose

Repeals cost-sharing requirements for the National Science Foundation Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program and makes conforming amendments so Noyce grants no longer depend on cost-share waiver language.

Policy Domains

Education STEM Rural Education

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Rural colleges
  • STEM teacher-preparation programs
  • Rural school districts
  • Prospective STEM teachers
  • NSF Noyce program staff
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Rural colleges:
Rural school districts:
NSF Noyce program staff:
Prospective STEM teachers:
STEM teacher-preparation programs:
Identified Costs
  • Federal taxpayers
  • NSF grant administration staff
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Federal taxpayers:
NSF grant administration staff:

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Dec 2, 2025

Mr. Riley of New York (for himself and Mr. Kennedy …

Dec 2, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.

Dec 2, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Education
4 mentions across 1 clause
+4 positive

Prospective STEM teachers, Rural colleges, Rural school districts

Government
1 mention across 1 clause
?1 uncertain

NSF Noyce program staff

Taxpayers
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Taxpayers

1/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Education STEM Rural Education

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology