HR633-119

Introduced

To require covered platforms to remove nonconsensual intimate visual depictions, and for other purposes.

119th Congress Introduced Jan 22, 2025

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

The bill requires federal criminal prohibition on knowingly publishing nonconsensual intimate visual depictions (including AI-generated digital forgeries) via interactive computer services, with separate offenses for adults, requires mandatory notice-and-takedown regime requiring covered platforms to establish a removal process for nonconsensual intimate visual depictions, respond within 48 hours, remove identical copies, enforced by FTC, and defines statutory definitions establishing scope of covered platform obligations, including user-generated content platforms while excluding broadband ISPs, email services, and primarily curated content services. It relies on compliance mandates, definition changes, liability protections, and reporting requirements. The main policy areas are Technology, Criminal Justice, and Education.

Who Benefits and How

Victims requesting content removal could face fewer barriers, Email service providers would be affected, and Broadband internet service providers would be affected.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Social media platforms and user-generated content websites would take on compliance duties, User-generated content platforms (social media, messaging, video/image hosting) would take on compliance duties, and Non-profit organizations hosting user content would take on compliance duties.

Key Provisions

  • Requires federal criminal prohibition on knowingly publishing nonconsensual intimate visual depictions (including AI-generated digital forgeries) via interactive computer services, with separate offenses for adults...
  • Requires mandatory notice-and-takedown regime requiring covered platforms to establish a removal process for nonconsensual intimate visual depictions, respond within 48 hours, remove identical copies, enforced by FTC...
  • Defines statutory definitions establishing scope of covered platform obligations, including user-generated content platforms while excluding broadband ISPs, email services, and primarily curated content services.
  • Requires federal criminal prohibition on knowingly publishing nonconsensual intimate visual depictions and AI-generated digital forgeries via interactive computer services, with penalties including imprisonment (up to 2...

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

The bill requires federal criminal prohibition on knowingly publishing nonconsensual intimate visual depictions (including AI-generated digital forgeries) via interactive computer services, with separate offenses for adults, requires mandatory notice-and-takedown regime requiring covered platforms to establish a removal process for nonconsensual intimate visual depictions, respond within 48 hours, remove identical copies, enforced by FTC, and defines statutory definitions establishing scope of covered platform obligations, including user-generated content platforms while excluding broadband ISPs, email services, and primarily curated content services.

Key Policy Areas

Technology, Criminal Justice, Education

Primary Purpose

The bill requires federal criminal prohibition on knowingly publishing nonconsensual intimate visual depictions (including AI-generated digital forgeries) via interactive computer services, with separate offenses for adults, requires mandatory notice-and-takedown regime requiring covered platforms to establish a removal process for nonconsensual intimate visual depictions, respond within 48 hours, remove identical copies, enforced by FTC, and defines statutory definitions establishing scope of covered platform obligations, including user-generated content platforms while excluding broadband ISPs, email services, and primarily curated content services.

Policy Domains

Technology Criminal Justice Education

Whole bill

Identified Gains
  • Victims requesting content removal
  • Email service providers
  • Broadband internet service providers
  • Curated content platforms (streaming services, news sites)
  • Covered platforms acting in good faith
Model: codex-gpt-5:bulk-repair | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh
Email service providers: ,
Victims requesting content removal: ,
Broadband internet service providers: ,
Covered platforms acting in good faith: ,
Curated content platforms (streaming services, news sites): ,
Identified Costs
  • Social media platforms and user-generated content websites
  • User-generated content platforms (social media, messaging, video/image hosting)
  • Non-profit organizations hosting user content
  • Individuals who publish nonconsensual intimate images or deepfakes
  • Individuals who publish nonconsensual intimate images online
Model: codex-gpt-5:bulk-repair | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh
Non-profit organizations hosting user content: ,
Social media platforms and user-generated content websites: ,
Individuals who publish nonconsensual intimate images online:
Individuals who publish nonconsensual intimate images or deepfakes:
User-generated content platforms (social media, messaging, video/image hosting): ,

Legislative Progress

Introduced
Introduced Committee Passed
Apr 28, 2025

Additional sponsors: Ms. De La Cruz, Mr. Costa, Mr. Smith …

Apr 28, 2025

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the …

Jan 22, 2025

Ms. Salazar (for herself, Ms. Dean of Pennsylvania, Mr. Pfluger, …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Technology
11 mentions across 6 clauses
+4 positive -7 negative

AI deepfake creators and distributors, AI-generated deepfake creators and distributors, Broadband internet service providers

Positive-direction: Broadband internet service providers, Covered platforms acting in good faith

Negative-direction: AI deepfake creators and distributors, AI-generated deepfake creators and distributors, Platforms specializing in hosting nonconsensual intimate visual depictions, Social media platforms and user-generated content websites, User-generated content platforms (social media, messaging, video/image hosting)

Individual Victims/Privacy Advocacy
5 mentions across 4 clauses
+5 positive

Minors depicted in intimate visual depictions, Victims of nonconsensual intimate image abuse, Victims of nonconsensual intimate image abuse (adults)

Law Enforcement
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

Law enforcement agencies, Law enforcement agencies (federal, state, local)

Content Moderation Services
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

Content moderation and trust-and-safety service providers

Nonprofits
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

Non-profit organizations hosting user content

Email/Communication Services
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

Email service providers

Media & Entertainment
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

Curated content platforms (streaming services, news sites)

Individual Perpetrators
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Individuals who publish nonconsensual intimate images or deepfakes

3/5
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Technology Criminal Justice Education

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology