HR6300-119

Reported

Grasslands Grazing Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Nov 25, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

This bill clarifies grazing lease and permit authority for national grasslands. It amends section 402(a) of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act by replacing the phrase "lands within National Forests" with "National Forest System land," using the definition in the Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act. The effect is to make clear that national grasslands, which are part of the National Forest System, are eligible for grazing leases and permits under section 402.

The bill also includes a savings clause. It says the amendment does not modify or affect any other FLPMA provision as applied to national grasslands, title III of the Bankhead-Jones Farm Tenant Act, or section 11 of the Public Rangelands Improvement Act. That means the bill targets grazing-permit eligibility rather than broadly rewriting national-grassland management law.

Who Benefits and How

Ranchers near national grasslands benefit from clearer authority for grazing permits and leases on national grassland acreage. Livestock producers benefit if permit eligibility reduces uncertainty around continued grazing access. Cattle ranching businesses benefit from more stable forage planning on National Forest System grasslands. U.S. Forest Service rangeland staff benefit from clearer statutory wording when administering grazing permits. Rural communities near national grasslands benefit if livestock operations retain access to federal grazing lands that support local agricultural activity.

Who Bears the Burden and How

U.S. Forest Service rangeland staff must apply the clarified FLPMA section 402 authority to national grassland grazing permits and leases. Conservation groups monitoring national grasslands must track grazing decisions under the clarified eligibility rule. Ranchers holding permits must still comply with permit terms, fees, allotment management, and other applicable grassland rules. Federal land managers must preserve the separate requirements of FLPMA, the Bankhead-Jones Farm Tenant Act, and the Public Rangelands Improvement Act. Communities concerned about grazing impacts may face continued or expanded grazing use on national grasslands.

Key Provisions

  • Modifies FLPMA section 402(a) by replacing lands within National Forests with National Forest System land.
  • Provides that national grasslands are eligible for grazing leases and permits under the clarified wording.
  • Provides a savings clause preserving other FLPMA provisions for national grasslands.
  • Provides that the bill does not modify title III of the Bankhead-Jones Farm Tenant Act.
  • Provides that the bill does not modify section 11 of the Public Rangelands Improvement Act.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Amends the Federal Land Policy and Management Act grazing-permit provision so national grasslands remain eligible for grazing leases and permits by replacing the phrase lands within National Forests with National Forest System land, while preserving other national-grassland authorities under FLPMA, the Bankhead-Jones Farm Tenant Act, and the Public Rangelands Improvement Act.

Key Policy Areas

Public Lands, Agriculture, Grazing

Primary Purpose

Amends the Federal Land Policy and Management Act grazing-permit provision so national grasslands remain eligible for grazing leases and permits by replacing the phrase lands within National Forests with National Forest System land, while preserving other national-grassland authorities under FLPMA, the Bankhead-Jones Farm Tenant Act, and the Public Rangelands Improvement Act.

Policy Domains

Public Lands Agriculture Grazing

House resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Ranchers near national grasslands
  • Livestock producers
  • Cattle ranching businesses
  • U.S. Forest Service rangeland staff
  • Rural communities near national grasslands
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Livestock producers:
Cattle ranching businesses:
Ranchers near national grasslands:
U.S. Forest Service rangeland staff:
Rural communities near national grasslands:
Identified Costs
  • U.S. Forest Service rangeland staff
  • Conservation groups monitoring national grasslands
  • Ranchers holding permits
  • Federal land managers
  • Communities concerned about grazing impacts
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Federal land managers:
Ranchers holding permits:
U.S. Forest Service rangeland staff:
Communities concerned about grazing impacts:
Conservation groups monitoring national grasslands:

Legislative Progress

Reported
Introduced Committee Passed
Feb 11, 2026

Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute …

Feb 11, 2026

Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

Feb 11, 2026

Subcommittee on Federal Lands Discharged

Jan 14, 2026

Subcommittee Hearings Held

Jan 13, 2026

Referred to the Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticulture.

Jan 7, 2026

Referred to the Subcommittee on Federal Lands.

Nov 25, 2025

Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition …

Nov 25, 2025

Introduced in House

Nov 25, 2025

Ms. Hageman introduced the following bill; which was referred to …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Ranching
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Ranchers near national grasslands

Agriculture
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Livestock producers

Cattle Ranching
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Cattle ranching businesses

Government
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

U.S. Forest Service rangeland staff

Environment
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Conservation groups monitoring national grasslands

1/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Public Lands Agriculture Grazing
Actor Mappings
"forest_service"
→ U.S. Forest Service

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology