HR6240-119

In Committee

Rural Hospital Closure Relief Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Nov 20, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Rural Hospital Closure Relief Act lets States, for nine years, certify certain rural hospitals as necessary providers eligible for critical access hospital designation even if they do not meet the ordinary 35-mile distance rule. Eligible hospitals include sole community hospitals, Medicare-dependent small rural hospitals, low-volume hospitals, and certain subsection (d) hospitals in rural areas or rural census tracts that meet poverty, health professional shortage, Medicare-volume, negative-margin, governance, solvency, and new-service-line criteria. The Secretary may certify no more than 120 facilities nationally and no more than five per State under the restored authority. MedPAC must study Medicare rural-hospital payment systems using 2018-2028 data and report within eight years. The bill also allows the Secretary to set appropriate acute-care bed limits for critical access hospitals in Guam, American Samoa, the Northern Mariana Islands, and the U.S. Virgin Islands, and it requires transition guidance before the nine-year sunset.

Who Benefits and How

Financially distressed rural hospitals benefit from a temporary path to critical access hospital designation and cost-based Medicare payment even when the 35-mile rule would otherwise block them. Rural Medicare beneficiaries benefit if hospitals maintain local access and add high-demand services such as obstetrics or behavioral health care. Territorial hospitals benefit from bed-limit flexibility that reflects Guam, American Samoa, the Northern Mariana Islands, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.

Who Bears the Burden and How

CMS and HHS must issue rules, evaluate applications, monitor national and State caps, review strategic plans, administer transitions, and provide technical assistance. State health agencies must certify necessary-provider status and may manage competition for limited slots. The Medicare program and Federal taxpayers may bear higher payment costs from additional critical access hospital designations.

Key Provisions

  • Authorizes States to certify certain struggling rural hospitals as necessary providers for critical access hospital designation for nine years.
  • Limits restored certifications to 120 facilities nationally and five facilities per State.
  • Requires applicant hospitals to show rural status, financial distress, governance and solvency planning, and a commitment to new or expanded high-demand services.
  • Requires MedPAC to study rural-hospital Medicare payment systems and report transition recommendations.
  • Allows the Secretary to set appropriate critical-access bed limits for hospitals in specified U.S. territories and requires sunset transition assistance.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Temporarily restores State authority to certify certain struggling rural hospitals as Medicare critical access hospitals, adjusts territorial bed rules, and requires MedPAC transition analysis.

Key Policy Areas

Healthcare, Rural Health, Medicare

Primary Purpose

Temporarily restores State authority to certify certain struggling rural hospitals as Medicare critical access hospitals, adjusts territorial bed rules, and requires MedPAC transition analysis.

Policy Domains

Healthcare Rural Health Medicare

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Financially distressed rural hospitals
  • Rural Medicare beneficiaries
  • Territorial hospitals
  • State health agencies
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
State health agencies: , , ,
Territorial hospitals: , , ,
Rural Medicare beneficiaries: , , ,
Financially distressed rural hospitals: , , ,
Identified Costs
  • Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
  • State hospital certification offices
  • Medicare program
  • Federal taxpayers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Medicare program: , , ,
Federal taxpayers: , , ,
State hospital certification offices: , , ,
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services: , , ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Nov 20, 2025

Mr. Vindman (for himself, Mr. Mann, and Mr. Moylan) introduced …

Nov 20, 2025

Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in …

Nov 20, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Healthcare
8 mentions across 4 clauses
+7 positive ~1 mixed

American Samoa hospitals, Financially distressed rural hospitals, Guam hospitals

Government
6 mentions across 4 clauses
+1 positive -5 negative

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Congressional health committees, Medicare Payment Advisory Commission

Positive-direction: Congressional health committees

Negative-direction: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, Medicare program

State & Local Government
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

State hospital certification offices

4/5
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Healthcare Rural Health Medicare

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology