HR6187-119

In Committee

Wojnovich Pipeline Safety Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Nov 20, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Wojnovich Pipeline Safety Act creates a detailed hazardous liquid pipeline safety and community response framework. PHMSA must establish a safety and modernization grant program for municipalities and community-owned nonprofit utilities in States that require pipeline disclosure in real estate contracts, with $100 million authorized annually for fiscal years 2026 through 2030, a 12.5 percent per-recipient cap, administrative cost limits, and DOT Inspector General oversight transfers. PHMSA’s website must be updated for easier public access to accident and incident details, and operators must provide remediation status updates at least every 90 days until remediation is complete. To qualify for grants, States must require real estate contracts to disclose known hazardous liquid pipeline easements within one-half mile of the property, including operator contact information, pipeline substance, repairs in the prior 10 years, and State leak or incident history. Pipeline operators must add community involvement strategies, localized emergency alerts within one mile of leaks or incidents, timely in-person water, soil, or air testing, well testing within one-half mile of events, annual in-line inspections for pipelines older than 50 years or sleeve repairs, and resident and landowner contamination notices. Operators that declare a leak, accident, incident, or failure owe a $2.5 million annual penalty until certified remediation, or $5 million if they do not declare within 15 days of knowing about the event. DOT must reimburse State and local emergency responders within 30 days for equipment, overtime, operational costs, and related response costs. Penalties fund a Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Community Trust Fund for grants and emergency reimbursements. PHMSA must report quarterly to Congress on industry safety knowledge and rename Community Liaison Services as the Office of Public Engagement.

Who Benefits and How

Municipalities with hazardous liquid pipeline infrastructure benefit from modernization grants and trust-fund disbursements. Community-owned nonprofit utilities benefit because they are eligible grant recipients and can use public-private partnerships. Home buyers near hazardous liquid pipelines benefit from mandatory easement, operator, substance, repair, and incident disclosures in real estate contracts. Landowners near hazardous liquid pipelines benefit from emergency alerts, community involvement strategies, testing, and contamination notices. Fire departments benefit from reimbursement for equipment replacement, overtime, and operational response costs after pipeline events. Pipeline construction contractors benefit from grant-funded modernization work for leak-prone hazardous liquid infrastructure.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Hazardous liquid pipeline operators must provide incident data, remediation updates, emergency alerts, testing, inspections, resident notices, and community involvement strategies. Pipeline operators that declare events face $2.5 million annual penalties until remediation is certified. Pipeline operators that fail to declare known events within 15 days face $5 million penalties. Real estate sellers near hazardous liquid pipeline easements must provide contract disclosures in grant-eligible States. PHMSA staff must administer grants, website updates, public data, rules, testing requirements, quarterly reports, and public engagement duties. DOT program staff must reimburse emergency response costs and administer the pipeline community trust fund.

Key Provisions

  • Authorizes $100 million per year from fiscal years 2026 through 2030 for hazardous liquid distribution infrastructure safety and modernization grants.
  • Requires PHMSA website upgrades with accident details and 90-day remediation status updates from operators.
  • Requires grant-eligible States to mandate real estate disclosures for known hazardous liquid pipeline easements within one-half mile of a property.
  • Requires localized emergency alerts, water-soil-air testing, well testing, annual inspections for older or sleeve-repaired pipelines, and resident contamination notices.
  • Imposes $2.5 million annual penalties for declared pipeline events and $5 million penalties for late declarations.
  • Creates emergency-response reimbursement and a Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Community Trust Fund financed by penalties.
  • Requires quarterly PHMSA reports on industry safety knowledge and creates an Office of Public Engagement.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Creates a hazardous liquid pipeline safety package with PHMSA modernization grants, public incident website upgrades, real-estate pipeline-easement disclosures, emergency alerts, water-soil-air testing, annual inspections for older or sleeve-repaired pipelines, multimillion-dollar penalties until remediation, emergency-response reimbursements, a pipeline community trust fund, quarterly PHMSA industry-knowledge reports, and an Office of Public Engagement.

Key Policy Areas

Pipeline Safety, Transportation, Emergency Response, Public Disclosure

Primary Purpose

Creates a hazardous liquid pipeline safety package with PHMSA modernization grants, public incident website upgrades, real-estate pipeline-easement disclosures, emergency alerts, water-soil-air testing, annual inspections for older or sleeve-repaired pipelines, multimillion-dollar penalties until remediation, emergency-response reimbursements, a pipeline community trust fund, quarterly PHMSA industry-knowledge reports, and an Office of Public Engagement.

Policy Domains

Pipeline Safety Transportation Emergency Response Public Disclosure

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Municipalities with hazardous liquid pipelines
  • Community-owned nonprofit utilities
  • Home buyers near pipelines
  • Landowners near pipelines
  • Fire departments
  • Pipeline construction contractors
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Fire departments: , , , , , , ,
Landowners near pipelines: , , , , , , ,
Home buyers near pipelines: , , , , , , ,
Pipeline construction contractors: , , , , , , ,
Community-owned nonprofit utilities: , , , , , , ,
Municipalities with hazardous liquid pipelines: , , , , , , ,
Identified Costs
  • Hazardous liquid pipeline operators
  • Real estate sellers near pipelines
  • PHMSA grant staff
  • DOT reimbursement staff
  • DOT Inspector General auditors
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
PHMSA grant staff: , , , , , , ,
DOT reimbursement staff: , , , , , , ,
DOT Inspector General auditors: , , , , , , ,
Real estate sellers near pipelines: , , , , , , ,
Hazardous liquid pipeline operators: , , , , , , ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Nov 21, 2025

Referred to the Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, and Hazardous Materials.

Nov 20, 2025

Mr. Fitzpatrick (for himself and Mr. Suozzi) introduced the following …

Nov 20, 2025

Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in …

Nov 20, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
11 mentions across 8 clauses
+2 positive -9 negative

Congressional transportation committees, DOT Inspector General auditors, DOT penalty staff

Positive-direction: Congressional transportation committees, Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Community Trust Fund

Negative-direction: DOT Inspector General auditors, DOT penalty staff, DOT reimbursement staff, DOT trust fund administrators, PHMSA grant staff, PHMSA public engagement staff, PHMSA public website staff, PHMSA reporting staff, PHMSA rulemaking staff

Oil & Gas
7 mentions across 7 clauses
-7 negative

Hazardous liquid pipeline operators, Pipeline operators

State & Local Government
6 mentions across 5 clauses
+5 positive -1 negative

Emergency response agencies, Municipalities with hazardous liquid pipelines, State pipeline safety officials

Positive-direction: Emergency response agencies, Municipalities with hazardous liquid pipelines, State pipeline safety officials

Negative-direction: State real estate regulators

General Public
5 mentions across 4 clauses
+5 positive

Communities near hazardous liquid pipelines, Communities near pipeline incidents, Communities near pipelines

Research & Science
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

Pipeline safety researchers

Law Enforcement
2 mentions across 1 clause
+2 positive

Fire departments, Law enforcement agencies

Real Estate
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Real estate sellers near pipelines

Utilities
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Community-owned nonprofit utilities

8/9
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Pipeline Safety Transportation Emergency Response Public Disclosure

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology