HR6163-119

Introduced

To amend the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 to allow Federal agencies to rely on certain previously completed environmental assessments and environmental impact statements to satisfy the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, and for other purposes.

119th Congress Introduced Nov 19, 2025

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

Lets federal agencies satisfy NEPA for substantially similar new actions by relying on or modifying previously completed environmental reviews.

Who Benefits and How

Project sponsors and agencies could move similar projects through NEPA faster by reusing or modifying prior environmental assessments or impact statements.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Communities and other parties that rely on full project-specific review could face less fresh analysis and public process for new actions.

Key Provisions

  • Allows a lead agency to rely on a previously completed environmental assessment or impact statement for a substantially similar new major federal action.
  • Lets the lead agency modify an existing review instead of starting from scratch when the new action is not substantially the same.
  • Requires any modified review to be made public as a new environmental assessment or impact statement.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Lets federal agencies satisfy NEPA for substantially similar new actions by relying on or modifying previously completed environmental reviews.

Key Policy Areas

Environment, Government Operations, Infrastructure

Primary Purpose

Lets federal agencies satisfy NEPA for substantially similar new actions by relying on or modifying previously completed environmental reviews.

Policy Domains

Environment Government Operations Infrastructure

Main Provisions

Identified Gains
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Project sponsors seeking faster NEPA review for similar projects
  • Federal agencies managing repeated environmental reviews
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Identified Costs
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Communities and stakeholders relying on project-specific environmental review
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Legislative Progress

Introduced
Introduced Committee Passed
Nov 19, 2025

Mr. Valadao introduced the following bill; which was referred to …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Construction
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Project sponsors seeking to reuse prior NEPA analysis for similar projects

General Public
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Communities and stakeholders relying on project-specific environmental review

1/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Environment Government Operations Infrastructure
Actor Mappings
"the_lead_agency"
→ Lead federal agency conducting NEPA review

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology