To prohibit the use of Federal funds by non-governmental organizations and the Department of the Interior for certain immigration-related services, except in the case of a minor.
Summary
What This Bill Does
Bars federal funds from being used by nongovernmental organizations for specified immigration-related legal, housing, and transportation services, with a limited exception for minors, and bars Interior from related administration or contracting.
Who Benefits and How
Supporters of tighter immigration-related spending controls could gain a broad federal funding restriction on NGO services tied to unlawful entry, subject to a minors exception.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Nongovernmental organizations providing the covered services would lose federal funding eligibility, and federal agencies would have to police compliance.
Key Provisions
- Prohibits federal funding for NGOs providing covered immigration legal, housing, or transportation services, except for minors.
- Bars the Department of the Interior from administering or contracting for related immigration and resettlement services.
- Requires agency heads to take reasonable actions to ensure compliance with the funding prohibition.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Bars federal funds from being used by nongovernmental organizations for specified immigration-related legal, housing, and transportation services, with a limited exception for minors, and bars Interior from related administration or contracting.
Key Policy Areas
Immigration, Government Operations, Criminal Justice
Primary Purpose
Bars federal funds from being used by nongovernmental organizations for specified immigration-related legal, housing, and transportation services, with a limited exception for minors, and bars Interior from related administration or contracting.
Policy Domains
Main Provisions
Identified Gains
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation- Federal officials and constituencies seeking tighter limits on immigration-related grant and contract spending
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
Identified Costs
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation- Nongovernmental organizations and affected service recipients losing access to federally funded immigration-related assistance
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
Legislative Progress
IntroducedMs. Van Duyne introduced the following bill; which was referred …
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Nongovernmental organizations providing covered immigration-related legal, housing, or transportation services
Federal agencies required to enforce the funding prohibition and contract restrictions
Minor recipients who remain eligible for covered federally funded services under the carveout
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology