HR598-119

In Committee

FIR Act

119th Congress Introduced Jan 21, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The FIR Act narrows when Federal land agencies must restart Endangered Species Act consultation for broad land plans. It amends the Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act for Forest Service land management plans and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act for BLM land use plans. In both settings, the Secretary is not required to reinitiate consultation under ESA section 7(a)(2) or the reinitiation regulation at 50 C.F.R. 402.16, or a successor regulation, for a plan already approved, amended, or revised when a new species is listed, critical habitat is designated, or new information shows plan effects on a listed species or critical habitat in a way not previously considered. The bill does not eliminate ESA consultation for specific future actions, but it reduces plan-level reconsultation triggers for large Forest Service and BLM planning documents.

Who Benefits and How

Forest Service planning offices benefit because they avoid reopening land management plan consultation solely due to new listings, critical habitat, or new information. Bureau of Land Management planning offices benefit from the same reduced plan-level ESA reconsultation obligation for FLPMA land use plans. Timber, grazing, recreation, energy, and other public-land permit applicants benefit if agency plan updates and project approvals face fewer plan-level delays. Rural counties and public-land users benefit from more predictable implementation of already approved federal land plans.

Who Bears the Burden and How

ESA-listed species and critical habitat protections may bear risk because new listings or new information would not automatically reopen plan-level consultation. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service consultation staff lose a trigger for reviewing broad land plans after changed species information. Environmental organizations may need to challenge individual projects or other agency actions rather than relying on plan-level reconsultation. Forest Service and BLM officials still must determine which actions are covered by the exemption and which project-specific consultations remain required.

Key Provisions

  • Amends Forest Service planning law to remove plan-level ESA reconsultation requirements for specified changed circumstances.
  • Amends FLPMA to apply the same rule to BLM land use plans.
  • Covers new species listings, critical habitat designations, and new information about plan effects.
  • Preserves the distinction between broad plan reconsultation and other ESA duties for future agency actions.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Amends Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management planning statutes so approved, amended, or revised land management and land use plans do not require reinitiated Endangered Species Act consultation solely because a new species is listed, new critical habitat is designated, or new information reveals effects not previously considered.

Key Policy Areas

Public Lands, Endangered Species, Forestry

Primary Purpose

Amends Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management planning statutes so approved, amended, or revised land management and land use plans do not require reinitiated Endangered Species Act consultation solely because a new species is listed, new critical habitat is designated, or new information reveals effects not previously considered.

Policy Domains

Public Lands Endangered Species Forestry

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Forest Service planning offices
  • Bureau of Land Management planning offices
  • Public land permit applicants
  • Rural counties
  • Public land users
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Rural counties:
Public land users:
Public land permit applicants:
Forest Service planning offices:
Bureau of Land Management planning offices:
Identified Costs
  • ESA-listed species
  • Critical habitat protections
  • Fish and Wildlife Service consultation staff
  • National Marine Fisheries Service consultation staff
  • Environmental organizations
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
ESA-listed species:
Environmental organizations:
Critical habitat protections:
Fish and Wildlife Service consultation staff:
National Marine Fisheries Service consultation staff:

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Feb 28, 2025

Referred to the Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticulture.

Jan 21, 2025

Mr. Zinke (for himself and Mr. Newhouse) introduced the following …

Jan 21, 2025

Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition …

Jan 21, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
4 mentions across 1 clause
+4 positive

Bureau of Land Management planning offices, Fish and Wildlife Service consultation staff, Forest Service planning offices

Environment
2 mentions across 1 clause
-2 negative

ESA-listed species, Environmental organizations

General Public
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Public land permit applicants

Fishing & Forestry
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Timber companies using federal land

Agriculture
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Grazing permit holders

1/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Public Lands Endangered Species Forestry

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology