HR5973-119

In Committee

Stop Excessive Force in Immigration Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Nov 7, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Stop Excessive Force in Immigration Act of 2025 adds a new section 287A to the Immigration and Nationality Act governing Federal immigration enforcement personnel. Congress frames the bill around human dignity, limits on excessive force, First Amendment protections for journalists, protesters, and bystanders, and condemnation of violence against law enforcement. The operative provisions allow non-deadly force only when no reasonably effective, safe, and feasible alternative appears to exist and the force is proportional to the actual or threatened resistance, with attention to age, injury, disability, and size. Officers must de-escalate when reasonable, minimize third-party injury, intervene to stop excessive force, report excessive force to command or DHS OIG, and request or render medical aid. The bill restricts masks and face coverings to written supervisory approvals for national security, future covert operations, or environmental hazards; requires uniforms or identification unless narrow safety conditions and written approval are met; bars immigration uniforms from using the title Police in a misleading way; and restricts flash bangs, rubber bullets, pepper balls, and tear gas to specified operations with tactical action plans, supervisor approval, training, and certification. DHS must issue a body-worn and dashboard camera directive within 180 days, with default-on protocols, training, retention rules, three-year retention for force or complaint footage, access rights for subjects and counsel, and deletion rules. DHS and DOJ must provide recurring reports on force, assaults against personnel, unidentified operations, facial coverings, and impersonation incidents, and DHS must maintain supervisor-accessible training and certification databases plus public redacted use-of-force and civil-rights reporting data. The rule of construction says the Act does not give extra deadly-force authority, does not stop personnel from taking necessary safety action, and does not require State or local law enforcement to help with Federal immigration enforcement.

Who Benefits and How

People subject to immigration enforcement benefit because the bill creates proportional-force, de-escalation, medical-aid, identification, camera, footage-access, and complaint-retention protections. Journalists, protesters, and lawful bystanders benefit because the findings and force limits reinforce First Amendment protections during immigration operations. Civil rights attorneys and oversight organizations benefit because body-camera retention, access rights, and searchable reporting databases create evidence for complaints, investigations, and litigation. State and local law enforcement benefit because the bill clarifies they are not required to assist Federal immigration enforcement operations. Body-worn camera and dashboard-camera vendors benefit if DHS must equip immigration enforcement personnel and vehicles.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Federal immigration enforcement personnel must comply with proportional-force rules, de-escalation duties, intervention duties, medical-aid duties, mask limits, identification rules, restricted-equipment rules, and camera protocols. DHS supervisors must provide written approvals, review tactical action plans, account for improper approvals, maintain training and certification proof, and enforce restricted-equipment requirements. DHS civil rights, OIG, and operational staff must investigate violations, retain footage, manage access requests, maintain databases, publish redacted data, and submit recurring congressional reports. The Attorney General and DOJ staff must report every six months on impersonation incidents and actions to combat people posing as immigration enforcement personnel. Federal taxpayers bear implementation costs for cameras, storage, training, reporting, investigation, and database systems.

Key Provisions

  • Adds new INA section 287A governing Federal immigration enforcement use of force.
  • Requires proportional non-deadly force, reasonable de-escalation, third-party injury minimization, intervention, reporting, and medical-aid duties.
  • Limits masks, face coverings, lack of identification, misleading Police labels, and restricted equipment such as flash bangs, rubber bullets, pepper balls, and tear gas.
  • Directs DHS to issue body-worn and dashboard camera rules within 180 days with training, retention, access, and deletion standards.
  • Requires six-month congressional reports on use of force, assaults against immigration personnel, unidentified operations, facial coverings, and impersonation incidents.
  • Creates training-certification and public redacted reporting databases for force, significant incidents, and civil-rights allegations.
  • Clarifies the bill does not expand deadly-force authority, prevent necessary safety action, or require State or local law enforcement participation.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Creates statutory limits for Federal immigration enforcement personnel on use of force, de-escalation, intervention and reporting duties, masks, identification, restricted nondeadly equipment, body and dashboard cameras, footage retention and access, congressional reports, training databases, and public use-of-force data while preserving officer safety authority.

Key Policy Areas

Immigration Enforcement, Civil Rights, Law Enforcement

Primary Purpose

Creates statutory limits for Federal immigration enforcement personnel on use of force, de-escalation, intervention and reporting duties, masks, identification, restricted nondeadly equipment, body and dashboard cameras, footage retention and access, congressional reports, training databases, and public use-of-force data while preserving officer safety authority.

Policy Domains

Immigration Enforcement Civil Rights Law Enforcement

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • People subject to immigration enforcement
  • Journalists covering immigration enforcement
  • Lawful protesters
  • Civil rights attorneys
  • State and local law enforcement agencies
  • Body-worn camera vendors
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Lawful protesters: , , ,
Civil rights attorneys: , , ,
Body-worn camera vendors: , , ,
State and local law enforcement agencies: , , ,
People subject to immigration enforcement: , , ,
Journalists covering immigration enforcement: , , ,
Identified Costs
  • Federal immigration enforcement personnel
  • DHS supervisors
  • DHS Office of Inspector General
  • DHS civil rights staff
  • Attorney General
  • Department of Justice staff
  • Federal taxpayers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
DHS supervisors: , , ,
Attorney General: , , ,
Federal taxpayers: , , ,
DHS civil rights staff: , , ,
Department of Justice staff: , , ,
DHS Office of Inspector General: , , ,
Federal immigration enforcement personnel: , , ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Nov 7, 2025

Mr. Peters (for himself, Mr. Goldman of New York, Mr. …

Nov 7, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Nov 7, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
8 mentions across 4 clauses
+2 positive -6 negative

DHS Office of Inspector General, DHS supervisors, Federal immigration enforcement personnel

Federal immigration enforcement personnel faces effects in multiple directions

Immigrant Communities
4 mentions across 4 clauses
+4 positive

People subject to immigration enforcement

Law Enforcement
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+1 positive -2 negative

Department of Justice staff, State and local law enforcement agencies

Positive-direction: State and local law enforcement agencies

Negative-direction: Department of Justice staff

Media & Entertainment
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+3 positive

Journalists covering immigration enforcement

Civil Liberties
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+3 positive

Lawful protesters

Professional Services
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

Civil rights attorneys

Technology
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

Body-worn camera vendors

Taxpayers
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

Taxpayers

4/5
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Immigration Enforcement Civil Rights Law Enforcement

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology