HR5896-119

In Committee

GRID Act

119th Congress Introduced Oct 31, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Guarding Ratepayers from Imposed EV Charging Directives Act, or GRID Act, repeals paragraph (21) of section 111(d) of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978. That paragraph is the federal electric vehicle charging program standard. The bill also repeals the matching section 112(b) consideration requirement, removes special section 112(c) timing language tied to that EV charging standard, repeals section 112(h), and removes a related section 124 reference. The practical effect is to take the EV charging program standard out of PURPA so State utility regulatory authorities and nonregulated electric utilities no longer have a federal PURPA duty to consider or report around that standard.

Who Benefits and How

State utility regulatory commissions benefit because they no longer have to run a PURPA consideration process for the EV charging program standard. Nonregulated electric utilities benefit because the federal PURPA EV charging consideration and related procedural duties are repealed. Electric ratepayers skeptical of utility-funded EV charging programs benefit if utilities face less federal pressure to socialize charging costs through rates. Utilities that prefer local or voluntary charging programs benefit from fewer federal procedural directives.

Who Bears the Burden and How

EV charging program advocates lose a federal PURPA standard that could push utilities and regulators to evaluate charging deployment. EV charging infrastructure developers may lose a federal policy lever for encouraging utility investment or rate treatment. Federal and State energy policy staff must update references and guidance after repeal of the EV charging standard provisions.

Key Provisions

  • Repeals the PURPA section 111(d)(21) electric vehicle charging program standard.
  • Repeals the related section 112(b) requirement to consider the EV charging standard.
  • Removes section 112(c), section 112(h), and section 124 language tied to the repealed EV charging standard.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Repeals the PURPA electric vehicle charging program standard and related consideration, timing, and reporting provisions, removing the federal requirement that State utility regulators and nonregulated utilities consider EV charging standards for utility planning and rate treatment.

Key Policy Areas

Electric Utilities, Electric Vehicles, Ratepayer Policy

Primary Purpose

Repeals the PURPA electric vehicle charging program standard and related consideration, timing, and reporting provisions, removing the federal requirement that State utility regulators and nonregulated utilities consider EV charging standards for utility planning and rate treatment.

Policy Domains

Electric Utilities Electric Vehicles Ratepayer Policy

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • State utility regulatory commissions
  • Nonregulated electric utilities
  • Ratepayers skeptical of utility-funded EV charging
  • Utilities using voluntary charging programs
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Nonregulated electric utilities:
State utility regulatory commissions:
Utilities using voluntary charging programs:
Ratepayers skeptical of utility-funded EV charging:
Identified Costs
  • EV charging program advocates
  • EV charging infrastructure developers
  • Federal energy policy staff
  • State energy policy staff
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
State energy policy staff:
Federal energy policy staff:
EV charging program advocates:
EV charging infrastructure developers:

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Oct 31, 2025

Mr. Van Drew introduced the following bill; which was referred …

Oct 31, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Oct 31, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Utilities
2 mentions across 1 clause
+2 positive

Nonregulated electric utilities, State utility regulatory commissions

Utility Customers
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Electric ratepayers skeptical of utility-funded EV charging

Automotive
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

EV charging infrastructure developers

Transportation
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

EV charging program advocates

2/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Electric Utilities Electric Vehicles Ratepayer Policy

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology