HR5875-119

In Committee

COWS Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Oct 31, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The COWS Act of 2025 amends the Food Security Act of 1985 to make composting and alternative manure management a more explicit part of USDA conservation programs. It defines composting practices as producing compost from on-farm or nearby community organic waste and actively managing compost on a farm to improve water retention and soil health. It defines alternative manure management practices as measures that reduce methane and nitrous oxide emissions, reduce nitrate leaching when applicable, or improve carbon sequestration, including pasture-based management, compost-bedded pack barns, frequently cleaned slatted floor pit storage, solid separation, scrape and vacuum technologies, manure system retrofits, solar drying, composting, vermiculture, vermifiltration, forced evaporation, and solid storage. The bill adds these practices to EQIP-style conservation purposes, lets USDA pay up to 100 percent of planning, design, materials, equipment, installation, labor, management, maintenance, and training costs, and requires at least 50 percent advanced payments for materials, equipment, or technical assistance. USDA must prioritize applications that maximize carbon sequestration, greenhouse gas reductions, and environmental and public health benefits, while ensuring geographic diversity, scale diversity, support for small and medium dairy and livestock operations, and participation by producers with conservation track records. It also allows joint applications for shared composting facilities, directs most alternative manure contracts to small and mid-sized operations including beginning, limited-resource, and socially disadvantaged producers, requires USDA emissions and carbon-estimation factors, allows payment-limit waivers when needed, and requires review and creation of composting practice standards within one year.

Who Benefits and How

Small and mid-sized dairy and livestock producers benefit because USDA must prioritize them for alternative manure management contracts. Beginning, limited-resource, and socially disadvantaged farmers benefit because the bill directs a majority of finalized contracts toward offers that include those producers. Producers adopting composting or dry manure systems benefit from up to 100 percent cost coverage and at least 50 percent advanced payments for materials, equipment, and technical assistance. Third-party technical assistance providers benefit because USDA may enter cooperative agreements for alternative manure management expertise. Nearby communities and watersheds benefit if the funded practices reduce methane, nitrous oxide, nitrate leaching, and water quality harms from wet manure systems.

Who Bears the Burden and How

USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service staff must write criteria, calculate emissions and carbon factors, administer advanced payments, evaluate joint applications, and revise conservation practice standards. Livestock producers applying for payments must document baseline manure practices, project benefits, contract terms, and compliance with federal, State, and local laws. USDA must conduct a one-year review of composting facility and soil carbon amendment practice standards and implement a new on-farm compost production standard. Federal taxpayers bear the cost of higher payment rates and advanced payments for alternative manure management contracts.

Key Provisions

  • Defines composting practice and alternative manure management practice under the Food Security Act conservation framework.
  • Expands conservation program purposes to include composting practices, alternative manure management, carbon sequestration, and greenhouse gas reductions.
  • Authorizes payments up to 100 percent of alternative manure management costs and requires at least 50 percent advanced payments for materials, equipment, or technical assistance.
  • Requires USDA to prioritize alternative manure applications by carbon, emissions, environmental, public health, geographic, scale, and producer-diversity criteria.
  • Authorizes joint producer applications for shared composting facilities and payment allocation among eligible producers.
  • Directs USDA to publish emissions and carbon factors, provide technical assistance, use cooperative agreements, waive payment limits when needed, and create a new on-farm compost production standard.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Expands USDA conservation support for composting and alternative manure management practices by defining eligible practices, authorizing up to 100 percent payments with at least 50 percent advanced payments, prioritizing small and mid-sized livestock operations, requiring emissions and carbon accounting factors, and directing new composting practice standards.

Key Policy Areas

Agriculture, Conservation, Climate

Primary Purpose

Expands USDA conservation support for composting and alternative manure management practices by defining eligible practices, authorizing up to 100 percent payments with at least 50 percent advanced payments, prioritizing small and mid-sized livestock operations, requiring emissions and carbon accounting factors, and directing new composting practice standards.

Policy Domains

Agriculture Conservation Climate

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Small dairy producers
  • Mid-sized livestock operations
  • Beginning farmers
  • Limited-resource farmers
  • Socially disadvantaged producers
  • Technical assistance providers
  • Watershed communities
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Beginning farmers: , , , , ,
Small dairy producers: , , , , ,
Watershed communities: , , , , ,
Limited-resource farmers: , , , , ,
Mid-sized livestock operations: , , , , ,
Technical assistance providers: , , , , ,
Socially disadvantaged producers: , , , , ,
Identified Costs
  • USDA conservation program staff
  • Livestock producers applying for contracts
  • NRCS practice standard writers
  • Federal taxpayers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Federal taxpayers: , , , , ,
NRCS practice standard writers: , , , , ,
USDA conservation program staff: , , , , ,
Livestock producers applying for contracts: , , , , ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Dec 2, 2025

Referred to the Subcommittee on Conservation, Research, and Biotechnology.

Dec 2, 2025

Referred to the Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry.

Oct 31, 2025

Mr. Costa (for himself, Mr. Valadao, Ms. Pingree, and Mr. …

Oct 31, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.

Oct 31, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Agriculture
8 mentions across 6 clauses
+8 positive

Beginning, limited-resource, and socially disadvantaged farmers, Dairy and livestock operations seeking EQIP funding for manure management, Dairy and livestock operations seeking large alternative manure management payments

Manufacturing
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

Composting equipment and technology providers, Manure management equipment and materials suppliers

Government
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

USDA/NRCS (must review and create new practice standards within 1 year), USDA/NRCS (new program administration and standards development)

Cattle Feedlots
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Large-scale confined animal feeding operations

Professional Services
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Third-party technical assistance providers with manure management expertise

6/9
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Agriculture Conservation Climate

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology