HR5853-119

Reported

To amend the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 to increase the civil penalties that may be imposed under such Act.

119th Congress Introduced Oct 28, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

This bill tightens civil penalties under the Export Control Reform Act of 2018. It amends section 1760(c)(1)(A) by raising one maximum civil penalty from $300,000 to $1,200,000. It also increases the alternative transaction-value penalty from twice the value of the transaction to four times the value of the transaction.

The change applies to violations of the Export Control Reform Act, and violations of regulations, orders, or licenses issued under that Act, committed on or after enactment. That means the bill does not rewrite export-control licensing rules directly; it increases the civil financial exposure for future violations of the existing export-control regime.

Who Benefits and How

BIS export enforcement officials benefit from higher penalty ceilings that can strengthen settlement leverage and deterrence. Federal national-security officials benefit if larger penalties discourage illegal transfers of controlled items, technology, software, or services. Export-control compliance attorneys benefit from increased demand for penalty-risk analysis and internal compliance advice. Companies that already invest in export compliance benefit if competitors face stronger consequences for violations. Congressional oversight committees benefit from a clearer statutory penalty increase for future ECRA violations.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Exporters subject to ECRA controls face higher civil penalty exposure for violations committed after enactment. Companies handling controlled technologies must strengthen screening, license compliance, recordkeeping, and employee training to avoid larger penalties. Freight forwarders and intermediaries involved in controlled exports face higher risk if they participate in violating transactions. BIS administrative enforcement staff must apply the new penalty ceilings in investigations, charging decisions, settlements, and penalty calculations. Small exporters may bear higher compliance costs because the downside risk of a violation rises sharply.

Key Provisions

  • Provides a fixed Export Control Reform Act civil penalty maximum of $1,200,000 instead of $300,000.
  • Modifies the alternative transaction-value penalty from twice the value of the transaction to four times the value.
  • Requires the increased penalties to apply to future violations of ECRA and regulations, orders, or licenses issued under ECRA.
  • Provides stronger civil deterrence without changing the underlying export-control licensing categories.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Increases Export Control Reform Act civil penalties for violations committed after enactment by raising the fixed maximum from $300,000 to $1.2 million and the transaction-value multiplier from twice the value of the transaction to four times the value.

Key Policy Areas

Export Controls, Trade Compliance, National Security

Primary Purpose

Increases Export Control Reform Act civil penalties for violations committed after enactment by raising the fixed maximum from $300,000 to $1.2 million and the transaction-value multiplier from twice the value of the transaction to four times the value.

Policy Domains

Export Controls Trade Compliance National Security

House resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • BIS export enforcement officials
  • Federal national-security officials
  • Export-control compliance attorneys
  • Companies with strong export compliance programs
  • Congressional oversight committees
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
BIS export enforcement officials:
Congressional oversight committees:
Export-control compliance attorneys:
Federal national-security officials:
Companies with strong export compliance programs:
Identified Costs
  • Exporters subject to ECRA controls
  • Companies handling controlled technologies
  • Freight forwarders
  • BIS administrative enforcement staff
  • Small exporters
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Small exporters:
Freight forwarders:
Exporters subject to ECRA controls:
BIS administrative enforcement staff:
Companies handling controlled technologies:

Legislative Progress

Reported
Introduced Committee Passed
Apr 22, 2026

Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 44 …

Apr 22, 2026

Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

Oct 28, 2025

Mr. Self (for himself and Mr. McCaul) introduced the following …

Oct 28, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

Oct 28, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Trade
2 mentions across 1 clause
+1 positive -1 negative

BIS export enforcement officials, Exporters subject to ECRA controls

Positive-direction: BIS export enforcement officials

Negative-direction: Exporters subject to ECRA controls

Technology
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Companies handling controlled technologies

Logistics
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Freight forwarders

Professional Services
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Export-control compliance attorneys

Small Business
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Small exporters

1/1
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Export Controls Trade Compliance National Security
Actor Mappings
"bis"
→ Bureau of Industry and Security
"ecra"
→ Export Control Reform Act of 2018

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology