HR5808-119

Introduced

To require the Secretary of State to designate the Federal Republic of Nigeria as a Country of Particular Concern, to impose certain sanctions, and for other purposes.

119th Congress Introduced Oct 21, 2025

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

Requires sanctions and religious-freedom designations tied to Nigeria and certain actors involved in blasphemy-law enforcement or related violence.

Who Benefits and How

Religious-freedom advocates and people targeted by blasphemy-law enforcement or related violence in Nigeria could gain stronger United States diplomatic and sanctions pressure.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Nigerian officials and entities targeted by the Act would face sanctions and designation risks, and State Department officials would need to produce recurring reports and designation reviews.

Key Provisions

  • Requires reports identifying Nigerian persons tied to blasphemy-law enforcement or tolerated violence and mandates sanctions on listed persons.
  • Requires the Secretary of State to designate Nigeria as a Country of Particular Concern and Boko Haram and ISIS-West Africa as Entities of Particular Concern, subject to limited waiver authority.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Requires sanctions and religious-freedom designations tied to Nigeria and certain actors involved in blasphemy-law enforcement or related violence.

Key Policy Areas

Foreign Policy, Civil Rights, Government Operations

Primary Purpose

Requires sanctions and religious-freedom designations tied to Nigeria and certain actors involved in blasphemy-law enforcement or related violence.

Policy Domains

Foreign Policy Civil Rights Government Operations

Main Provisions

Identified Gains
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Religious-freedom advocates and people targeted by blasphemy-law enforcement or related violence in Nigeria
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Identified Costs
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Nigerian officials and entities facing sanctions or religious-freedom designations
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Legislative Progress

Introduced
Introduced Committee Passed
Oct 21, 2025

Mr. Stutzman introduced the following bill; which was referred to …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
6 mentions across 3 clauses
-5 negative ?1 uncertain

Congressional oversight committees (Foreign Relations and Foreign Affairs), Department of State, Federal Republic of Nigeria

Religious & Civil Liberties Organizations
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

Nigerian religious minorities, Nigerian religious minorities (Christians and others)

Designated Terrorist Organizations
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Boko Haram and ISIS-West Africa

3/4
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Foreign Policy Civil Rights Government Operations

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology