BLOOD Centers Act
Summary
What This Bill Does
The BLOOD Centers Act speeds FDA review when an established blood center wants to add an apheresis collection device to an existing biologics license at a location that has not previously been licensed under that application. Within 180 days, HHS acting through FDA must establish an expedited supplemental application procedure. FDA must approve a qualifying application within 30 days unless it identifies a specific safety, purity, or potency concern at the location or a systemic failure by the owner or operator. The streamlined path is limited to experienced blood center owners: they must already hold a biologics license for at least one blood center site and either have approved locations under that license or hold qualifying accreditation in good standing.
Who Benefits and How
Blood center owners benefit because adding apheresis devices at new collection locations gets a 30-day FDA decision pathway. Blood donation centers benefit because the bill can speed expansion of platelet, plasma, or other apheresis collection capacity. Patients needing blood components benefit if expedited device approvals help blood centers increase component availability. Apheresis device vendors benefit indirectly if licensed blood centers can deploy devices across more sites faster.
Who Bears the Burden and How
FDA biologics license reviewers must build the expedited procedure within 180 days and decide eligible supplements within 30 days. Blood center compliance teams must prove license history, accreditation status, and location-specific safety readiness. Blood centers with safety, purity, potency, or systemic compliance problems remain exposed to denial under the expedited procedure. Federal regulators bear oversight risk because faster approvals still must protect blood product safety.
Key Provisions
- Requires HHS through FDA to establish an expedited procedure within 180 days.
- Requires FDA approval within 30 days unless specific safety, purity, potency, or systemic failure concerns exist.
- Applies to supplemental applications adding apheresis collection devices to existing biologics licenses.
- Limits eligibility to experienced blood center owners with licensed sites or qualifying accreditation.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Requires FDA to create a 30-day expedited supplemental biologics license process for qualified blood center owners adding apheresis collection devices at additional collection locations.
Key Policy Areas
Health Care, FDA, Blood Supply
Primary Purpose
Requires FDA to create a 30-day expedited supplemental biologics license process for qualified blood center owners adding apheresis collection devices at additional collection locations.
Policy Domains
Resolution provisions
Identified Gains
- Blood center owners
- Blood donation centers
- Patients needing blood components
- Apheresis device vendors
Identified Costs
- FDA biologics license reviewers
- Blood center compliance teams
- Blood centers with safety problems
- Federal regulators
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
In CommitteeMr. Wied (for himself, Ms. Schrier, and Mr. Tiffany) introduced …
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Introduced in House
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Apheresis device vendors, Blood center compliance teams, Blood center owners
Positive-direction: Apheresis device vendors, Blood center owners, Blood donation centers
Negative-direction: Blood center compliance teams
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology