HR5745-119

In Committee

Marine Fisheries Habitat Protection Act

119th Congress Introduced Oct 14, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Marine Fisheries Habitat Protection Act rewrites artificial reef law for inactive offshore oil and gas platforms, structures, facilities, pipelines, and related infrastructure. It defines artificial reefs, approved structures, eligible structures, reef planning areas, established reef ecosystems, covered waters, and reefing in place. An applicant may submit a notice of intent to reef an inactive structure. Within 180 days, BSEE must start or arrange an assessment, in consultation with NOAA, of the corals, fish, and marine life using the structure and the economic benefit of reefing compared with replacing the structure with equivalent artificial reef material. Assessments should finish within one year. Within 60 days after assessment completion, Interior decides whether the structure is eligible and may approve reefing in place, including toppling in place or leaving the structure standing when standards are met. The bill provides public notice, state and fishery consultation, appeal opportunities, limits decommissioning orders for structures under review or appeal, preserves pipeline abandonment rules unless a pipeline is specifically converted to an artificial reef, and allows removal when a structure poses a substantial and imminent threat to navigation or the marine environment.

Who Benefits and How

Recreational anglers benefit when productive offshore structures can remain as artificial reefs supporting fish habitat. Commercial fishermen benefit if reefing in place preserves established reef ecosystems and fishing opportunities. Offshore platform operators benefit from a statutory alternative to full removal during decommissioning when structures qualify. State artificial reef programs benefit from consultation roles and potential use of structures in state reef planning.

Who Bears the Burden and How

BSEE decommissioning staff must assess notices, determine eligibility, coordinate reviews, and manage appeals and decommissioning limits. NOAA fisheries habitat staff must consult on marine life, fishery resources, and reef ecosystem effects. Environmental organizations may bear ecological risk if structures remain despite concerns over pollution, navigation, or habitat impacts. Applicants seeking reefing approval must prepare notices, assessments, economic comparisons, and compliance documentation.

Key Provisions

  • Defines artificial reef, approved structure, eligible structure, inactive structure, reef planning area, and reefing in place.
  • Allows applicants to submit notices of intent to reef inactive offshore structures.
  • Requires assessments of marine habitat use and economic benefits compared with replacement artificial material.
  • Requires BSEE and NOAA consultation before eligibility and approval decisions.
  • Provides public notice, state consultation, fishery consultation, appeals, and limits on decommissioning during review.
  • Preserves existing pipeline abandonment rules unless a pipeline is designated for artificial reef conversion.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Creates a reef-in-place process for inactive offshore oil and gas structures under the National Fishing Enhancement Act, allowing eligible platforms and pipelines to become artificial reefs after BSEE and NOAA assessment, state or third-party review, public notice, Secretary approval, appeal rights, decommissioning limits, and navigational or environmental safety exceptions.

Key Policy Areas

Fisheries, Offshore Energy, Marine Habitat

Primary Purpose

Creates a reef-in-place process for inactive offshore oil and gas structures under the National Fishing Enhancement Act, allowing eligible platforms and pipelines to become artificial reefs after BSEE and NOAA assessment, state or third-party review, public notice, Secretary approval, appeal rights, decommissioning limits, and navigational or environmental safety exceptions.

Policy Domains

Fisheries Offshore Energy Marine Habitat

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Recreational anglers
  • Commercial fishermen
  • Offshore platform operators
  • State artificial reef programs
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Commercial fishermen: , ,
Recreational anglers: , ,
Offshore platform operators: , ,
State artificial reef programs: , ,
Identified Costs
  • BSEE decommissioning staff
  • NOAA fisheries habitat staff
  • Environmental organizations
  • Applicants seeking reefing approval
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
BSEE decommissioning staff: , ,
Environmental organizations: , ,
NOAA fisheries habitat staff: , ,
Applicants seeking reefing approval: , ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Jan 13, 2026

Subcommittee Hearings Held

Jan 7, 2026

Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources.

Oct 14, 2025

Mr. Ezell (for himself, Mr. Carter of Louisiana, and Mr. …

Oct 14, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

Oct 14, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
5 mentions across 3 clauses
-5 negative

BSEE decommissioning staff, NOAA fisheries habitat staff

Fishing & Forestry
4 mentions across 2 clauses
+4 positive

Commercial fishermen, Recreational anglers

Energy
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+3 positive

Offshore platform operators

State & Local Government
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

State artificial reef programs

Environment
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

Environmental organizations

3/4
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Fisheries Offshore Energy Marine Habitat

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology