To amend section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934 to limit the immunity of providers and users of interactive computer services under such section, and for other purposes.
Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.
Summary
What This Bill Does
The bill provides limitation of section 230 immunity Section 230(c) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. It relies on definition changes, appropriations, reporting requirements, and compliance mandates. The main policy areas are Telecommunications, Finance, Foreign Policy, and Criminal Justice.
Who Benefits and How
Telecommunications providers and users affected by the bill could face lower compliance burdens, Law enforcement, justice-system actors, and affected communities could face lower compliance burdens, and Foreign businesses and cross-border trade participants affected by the bill could face lower compliance burdens.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause would take on compliance duties.
Key Provisions
- Provides limitation of section 230 immunity Section 230(c) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
The bill provides limitation of section 230 immunity Section 230(c) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C.
Key Policy Areas
Telecommunications, Finance, Foreign Policy, Criminal Justice
Primary Purpose
The bill provides limitation of section 230 immunity Section 230(c) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C.
Policy Domains
Whole bill
Identified Gains
- Telecommunications providers and users affected by the bill
- Law enforcement, justice-system actors, and affected communities
- Foreign businesses and cross-border trade participants affected by the bill
- Businesses and employers affected by the bill
Identified Costs
- Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause
Legislative Progress
IntroducedMr. Steube introduced the following bill; which was referred to …
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Law enforcement, justice-system actors, and affected communities
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology