Metropolitan Planning Enhancement Act
Summary
What This Bill Does
The Metropolitan Planning Enhancement Act adds project-selection transparency rules to federal highway and transit planning statutes. For metropolitan transportation plans under title 23 and title 49, projects in the adopted plan must be selected through a publicly available process using criteria tied to statutory planning factors, national transportation goals, and applicable state goals. The criteria must publicly categorize the highest-performing projects, and priority lists must generally come from that highest-performing category. If a lower-categorized project is included before a higher-categorized project, planners must provide a public description explaining why, including geographic balance and projects in economically distressed areas. Parallel requirements are added for statewide and nonmetropolitan long-range transportation plans and transportation improvement programs under both highway and transit planning authorities.
Who Benefits and How
Residents reviewing transportation plans benefit from public project-ranking criteria and explanations for lower-ranked selections. Communities in economically distressed areas benefit because planners may justify lower-categorized projects based on economic distress and geographic balance. Transportation advocacy organizations benefit from clearer data to challenge or support project prioritization decisions. High-performing project sponsors benefit when priority lists must generally draw from the highest-performing project category.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Metropolitan planning organizations must publish criteria, categorize projects, and explain deviations in adopted plans and priority lists. State transportation departments must apply similar transparent criteria in statewide and nonmetropolitan planning and improvement programs. Transit planning agencies must update title 49 planning processes for metropolitan and statewide transit project selection. Transportation project sponsors with lower-ranked projects may need to justify selection through public explanations.
Key Provisions
- Requires public project-selection criteria for metropolitan transportation plans under title 23.
- Requires priority lists to draw from highest-performing project categories or explain lower-categorized selections.
- Requires the same transparency approach for statewide and nonmetropolitan highway planning.
- Requires parallel project-selection transparency in title 49 transit metropolitan and statewide planning.
- Provides explanation factors including geographic balance and economically distressed areas.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Requires metropolitan, statewide, nonmetropolitan, highway, and transit transportation plans to use public project-selection criteria tied to planning factors and transportation goals, publicly categorize highest-performing projects, and explain any lower-categorized project selected ahead of higher-performing projects.
Key Policy Areas
Transportation, Planning, Transparency
Primary Purpose
Requires metropolitan, statewide, nonmetropolitan, highway, and transit transportation plans to use public project-selection criteria tied to planning factors and transportation goals, publicly categorize highest-performing projects, and explain any lower-categorized project selected ahead of higher-performing projects.
Policy Domains
Resolution provisions
Identified Gains
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation- Residents reviewing transportation plans
- Communities in economically distressed areas
- Transportation advocacy organizations
- High-performing project sponsors
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
Identified Costs
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation- Metropolitan planning organizations
- State transportation departments
- Transit planning agencies
- Transportation project sponsors
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
Legislative Progress
In CommitteeMr. DeSaulnier introduced the following bill; which was referred to …
Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
Introduced in House
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology