HR5639-119

In Committee

Co-Location Energy Act

119th Congress Introduced Sep 30, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Co-Location Energy Act lets renewable energy projects use land already committed to federal energy leasing. If an oil, gas, or geothermal leaseholder consents, the Interior Secretary may authorize another person to evaluate the leased area for solar or wind development and may issue permits for solar or wind production, transportation, storage, or transmission facilities on that same lease area. The bill also requires Interior, within 180 days, to decide whether co-located solar and wind actions, or solar and wind actions on other non-leased public-land areas, normally do not significantly affect the human environment under NEPA. Interior must then issue rules to carry out the section.

Who Benefits and How

Renewable energy developers benefit because the bill creates a path to use already leased federal land for solar and wind projects. Federal energy leaseholders benefit because projects cannot proceed on their lease areas without their consent and may create co-location opportunities. Transmission developers benefit because the permit authority covers transportation, storage, and transmission facilities tied to solar or wind energy. Public-land energy planners benefit from a required NEPA category review that could clarify which co-location actions qualify for faster environmental processing.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Interior renewable permitting staff must create a consent-based review and permitting process for co-located solar and wind projects. Environmental review staff must complete the 180-day categorical-exclusion analysis and support later rulemaking. Oil gas geothermal leaseholders must evaluate consent requests and coordinate surface use if renewable facilities share lease areas. Public land users may face changed land-use patterns when existing lease areas add solar, wind, storage, or transmission infrastructure.

Key Provisions

  • Authorizes solar and wind evaluation on existing federal energy leases with leaseholder consent.
  • Authorizes permits for solar or wind production, transportation, storage, and transmission facilities on existing lease areas.
  • Requires a 180-day Interior review of whether specified solar and wind actions normally avoid significant NEPA effects.
  • Requires Interior rulemaking to implement the co-location authority.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Authorizes Interior to allow solar and wind evaluation, permitting, construction, operation, transportation, storage, and transmission on existing federal energy lease areas when the leaseholder consents, and requires NEPA categorical-exclusion review and implementing rules.

Key Policy Areas

Energy, Public Lands, Permitting

Primary Purpose

Authorizes Interior to allow solar and wind evaluation, permitting, construction, operation, transportation, storage, and transmission on existing federal energy lease areas when the leaseholder consents, and requires NEPA categorical-exclusion review and implementing rules.

Policy Domains

Energy Public Lands Permitting

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Renewable energy developers
  • Federal energy leaseholders
  • Transmission developers
  • Public-land energy planners
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Transmission developers:
Federal energy leaseholders:
Public-land energy planners:
Renewable energy developers:
Identified Costs
  • Interior renewable permitting staff
  • Environmental review staff
  • Oil gas geothermal leaseholders
  • Public land users
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Public land users:
Environmental review staff:
Oil gas geothermal leaseholders:
Interior renewable permitting staff:

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Mar 25, 2026

Subcommittee Hearings Held

Mar 18, 2026

Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources.

Sep 30, 2025

Mr. Kennedy of Utah (for himself and Mr. Levin) introduced …

Sep 30, 2025

Introduced in House

Sep 30, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
2 mentions across 1 clause
-2 negative

Environmental review staff, Interior renewable permitting staff

Renewable Energy
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Renewable energy developers

Energy
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Federal energy leaseholders

Electric Transmission
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Transmission developers

General Public
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Public land users

1/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Energy Public Lands Permitting

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology