HR5624-119

Introduced

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 with respect to eligibility for certain crime control grants.

119th Congress Introduced Sep 30, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

Makes certain state and local jurisdictions ineligible for specified federal crime-control grants if they substantially limit cash bail for covered offenses, allow personal-recognizance release for prior felons, or reduce law-enforcement budgets outside proportionate overall shortfalls.

Who Benefits and How

Law enforcement agencies and public-safety advocates could benefit from federal grant pressure against bail-reform and law-enforcement budget-reduction policies.

Who Bears the Burden and How

States and local governments with covered bail policies or law-enforcement budget reductions could lose federal grant eligibility, and defendants affected by cash-bail rules may face higher barriers to pretrial release.

Key Provisions

  • Provides a short title.
  • Bars Byrne/JAG-style grants to states or local governments that substantially limit cash bail for every individual charged with covered offenses.
  • Bars those grants to jurisdictions allowing personal-recognizance release for individuals previously convicted of a felony.
  • Defines covered offenses to include violent, sexual, and public-disorder offenses.
  • Bars COPS-style grants to urbanized local governments that reduced law-enforcement budgets in the prior fiscal year unless the reduction reflected a proportionate overall budget shortfall.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Makes certain state and local jurisdictions ineligible for specified federal crime-control grants if they substantially limit cash bail for covered offenses, allow personal-recognizance release for prior felons, or reduce law-enforcement budgets outside proportionate overall shortfalls.

Key Policy Areas

Criminal Justice, Appropriations, State Government, Law Enforcement

Primary Purpose

Makes certain state and local jurisdictions ineligible for specified federal crime-control grants if they substantially limit cash bail for covered offenses, allow personal-recognizance release for prior felons, or reduce law-enforcement budgets outside proportionate overall shortfalls.

Policy Domains

Criminal Justice Appropriations State Government Law Enforcement

Main Provisions

Identified Gains
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Law enforcement agencies and public-safety advocates in jurisdictions maintaining cash bail and law-enforcement budgets
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Identified Costs
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • States and local governments with covered bail or law-enforcement budget policies
  • Pretrial defendants affected by cash-bail policy requirements
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Legislative Progress

Introduced
Introduced Committee Passed
Sep 30, 2025

Mr. Harris of North Carolina (for himself, Mr. Biggs of …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

State & Local Government
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

States and local governments with covered bail-reform or law-enforcement budget-reduction policies

Law Enforcement
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Law enforcement agencies in jurisdictions maintaining grant-eligible funding and bail policies

General Public
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Pretrial defendants facing greater cash-bail or release restrictions

Federal Administration
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Attorney General and DOJ grant administrators enforcing new eligibility limits

2/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Criminal Justice Appropriations State Government Law Enforcement
Actor Mappings
"attorney_general"
→ Attorney General

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology