Katie Meyer’s Law
Summary
What This Bill Does
Katie Meyer's Law creates a federal funding condition for campus conduct proceedings. To remain eligible for funds under an applicable higher-education program, an institution must adopt a policy giving a student who receives notice of an alleged code-of-conduct violation the option to be assisted by an adviser. The notice must tell the student that they may select an outside adviser or request an independent adviser from the institution. Institutions may provide an independent adviser through a confidential respondent services coordinator, a student-based peer support program, or an alumni-based support program. Advisers must be trained on the institution's adjudication procedures, may receive biweekly updates during the process with the student's written permission, and may participate in adjudication meetings as an adviser. The bill also requires confidentiality for adviser communications and preserves the student's right to be assisted by another person where existing law or institutional policy already provides that right.
Who Benefits and How
Students in campus conduct proceedings benefit because they can choose outside or independent adviser support after receiving an allegation notice. Student peer support programs benefit because colleges may use them to provide independent advisers. Alumni support programs benefit because institutions may contract with them for respondent-adviser services. Confidential respondent services coordinators benefit from a defined role in helping accused students navigate adjudication.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Institutions of higher education must adopt adviser policies to keep federal higher-education funding eligibility. Campus conduct offices must revise allegation notices, train advisers, share updates with permission, and accommodate adviser participation. Independent advisers must complete institution-specific adjudication training and preserve confidentiality. Education Department program staff must monitor funding-condition compliance.
Key Provisions
- Requires federally funded colleges to adopt student-adviser policies for code-of-conduct proceedings.
- Provides students the option to choose an outside adviser or request an independent institutional adviser.
- Allows institutions to use respondent services coordinators, student peer support, or alumni support programs.
- Requires adviser training, biweekly updates with written permission, adjudication participation, and confidentiality.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Conditions federal higher-education funds on colleges adopting policies that give students accused of code-of-conduct violations the option of an outside or independent adviser, adviser training, biweekly updates with student permission, participation in adjudication meetings, and confidentiality protections.
Key Policy Areas
Higher Education, Student Rights, Campus Discipline
Primary Purpose
Conditions federal higher-education funds on colleges adopting policies that give students accused of code-of-conduct violations the option of an outside or independent adviser, adviser training, biweekly updates with student permission, participation in adjudication meetings, and confidentiality protections.
Policy Domains
Resolution provisions
Identified Gains
- Students in campus conduct proceedings
- Student peer support programs
- Alumni support programs
- Confidential respondent services coordinators
Identified Costs
- Institutions of higher education
- Campus conduct offices
- Independent advisers
- Education Department program staff
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
In CommitteeMs. Brownley (for herself and Mr. Thanedar) introduced the following …
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Introduced in House
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Alumni support programs, Campus conduct offices, Institutions of higher education
Positive-direction: Alumni support programs, Student peer support programs, Students in campus conduct proceedings
Negative-direction: Campus conduct offices, Institutions of higher education
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology