HR5544-119

In Committee

Ejiao Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Sep 23, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Ejiao Act of 2025 targets the commercial supply chain for ejiao, a gelatin made from donkey skin and used in traditional medicine, beauty, cosmetic, and luxury products. Congress finds that global demand is about 8 million to 10 million skins per year, that China's annual supply is below 1.8 million, that China's donkey population has fallen 76 percent since 1992, and that the trade harms families in Africa and Latin America that rely on donkeys for farming, water transport, market access, construction, and school transportation. The bill makes it unlawful to knowingly import, export, transport, sell, receive, acquire, or purchase donkeys or donkey hides in U.S. interstate or foreign commerce for producing ejiao or products containing ejiao, and separately bans commerce in products containing ejiao, including internet sales. Violators face CBP civil penalties of up to $10,000 per violation, criminal penalties for knowing import/export or sale/purchase conduct, and forfeiture of donkeys, hides, ejiao products, and in felony cases vessels, vehicles, aircraft, and equipment used in the violation. CBP and the Secretary of the Interior enforce the Act, with support from Homeland Security, Agriculture, other federal agencies, state agencies, and Indian tribes. Authorized officers may carry firearms, make arrests, search and seize under applicable warrant rules, detain and inspect conveyances and containers, and use customs forfeiture procedures.

Who Benefits and How

Families relying on donkeys in vulnerable communities benefit because the U.S. market would no longer support ejiao demand tied to stolen or slaughtered working animals. Animal welfare organizations benefit from a federal commerce ban, penalties, forfeiture, and enforcement tools aimed at the donkey-skin trade. CBP enforcement officers benefit from explicit civil penalty, forfeiture, inspection, and customs-procedure authority for ejiao-related shipments. Plant-based gelatin suppliers benefit if manufacturers shift away from donkey-skin gelatin alternatives.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Ejiao product sellers must stop importing, exporting, selling, or purchasing ejiao products in U.S. commerce. Donkey-hide traders face civil penalties, criminal penalties, forfeiture, and seizure risk for covered conduct. Interior wildlife inspectors must help enforce the Act and coordinate with CBP and other agencies. Transportation carriers may face forfeiture exposure if vessels, vehicles, aircraft, or equipment are used in felony violations.

Key Provisions

  • Prohibits U.S. commerce in donkeys or donkey hides for ejiao production and in products containing ejiao.
  • Provides civil penalties of up to $10,000 per violation and criminal penalties for knowing import, export, sale, or purchase conduct.
  • Requires forfeiture of covered animals, hides, products, and in felony cases conveyances and equipment used in violations.
  • Authorizes CBP, Interior, Homeland Security, Agriculture, state agencies, and tribes to enforce the Act.
  • Defines donkey, ejiao, import, and taken for enforcement purposes.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Bans U.S. interstate and foreign commerce in donkeys, donkey hides, and products containing ejiao for ejiao production, imposes civil penalties up to $10,000 per violation plus criminal penalties, forfeiture, and enforcement authority for CBP, Interior, Homeland Security, Agriculture, state agencies, and tribes.

Key Policy Areas

Trade, Animal Welfare, Customs Enforcement

Primary Purpose

Bans U.S. interstate and foreign commerce in donkeys, donkey hides, and products containing ejiao for ejiao production, imposes civil penalties up to $10,000 per violation plus criminal penalties, forfeiture, and enforcement authority for CBP, Interior, Homeland Security, Agriculture, state agencies, and tribes.

Policy Domains

Trade Animal Welfare Customs Enforcement

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Agricultural families relying on donkeys
  • Animal welfare organizations
  • CBP enforcement officers
  • Plant-based gelatin manufacturers
  • Indian tribal enforcement offices
  • State wildlife agencies
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
State wildlife agencies: , , , , ,
CBP enforcement officers: , , , , ,
Animal welfare organizations: , , , , ,
Indian tribal enforcement offices: , , , , ,
Plant-based gelatin manufacturers: , , , , ,
Agricultural families relying on donkeys: , , , , ,
Identified Costs
  • Ejiao product importers
  • Donkey-hide trade workers
  • Interior wildlife enforcement officers
  • Transportation carrier companies
  • Court of International Trade staff
  • Attorney General collection staff
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Ejiao product importers: , , , , ,
Donkey-hide trade workers: , , , , ,
Transportation carrier companies: , , , , ,
Attorney General collection staff: , , , , ,
Court of International Trade staff: , , , , ,
Interior wildlife enforcement officers: , , , , ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Sep 23, 2025

Mr. Beyer (for himself, Mr. Steube, Ms. Titus, Mr. Fitzpatrick, …

Sep 23, 2025

Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in …

Sep 23, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
7 mentions across 4 clauses
+2 positive -5 negative

CBP enforcement officers, CBP forfeiture staff, Indian tribal enforcement offices

CBP enforcement officers faces effects in multiple directions

Positive-direction: CBP forfeiture staff

Negative-direction: Indian tribal enforcement offices, Interior wildlife inspectors

Trade
5 mentions across 3 clauses
-5 negative

Donkey-hide traders, Ejiao product sellers

International Communities
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

Families relying on donkeys

Nonprofits
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Animal welfare organizations

Transportation
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Transportation carriers

Judiciary
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Court of International Trade staff

State & Local Government
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

State wildlife agencies

6/7
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Trade Animal Welfare Customs Enforcement

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology