HR5514-119

In Committee

POJA Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Sep 19, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The POJA Act of 2025 is a study and reporting bill focused on older job applicants. Within one year, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission must study the number of claims pending or filed with the Commission since 2015 under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, including closed cases, by job applicants who may have been adversely impacted by age discrimination in the job application process. The EEOC Chair must submit the results to the House Committee on Education and Labor and the Senate HELP Committee and make the report public. The report must include recommendations for best practices to prevent, combat, and address age discrimination in hiring.

Who Benefits and How

Older job applicants benefit because the EEOC must quantify and study hiring-related age discrimination claims. Age discrimination plaintiffs benefit from public information about claim patterns and best practices. Employment attorneys benefit from a public EEOC report covering ADEA applicant claims since 2015. Congressional labor committees benefit from data and recommendations for potential age-discrimination legislation.

Who Bears the Burden and How

EEOC research staff must review pending, filed, and closed ADEA job-applicant claims dating back to 2015. EEOC Chair staff must prepare and publicly release the report within one year. Employers using age-sensitive hiring practices may face scrutiny from best-practice recommendations. Federal taxpayers fund the agency study and reporting work.

Key Provisions

  • Requires an EEOC study of ADEA job-applicant claims since 2015.
  • Includes pending, filed, and closed claims involving alleged hiring age discrimination.
  • Requires a public report to House and Senate labor committees within one year.
  • Requires best-practice recommendations to prevent and address age discrimination in hiring.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Requires the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission within one year to study Age Discrimination in Employment Act claims pending or filed since 2015 by job applicants who may have been harmed by age discrimination in hiring, then report publicly and to House and Senate labor committees with best-practice recommendations.

Key Policy Areas

Labor, Age Discrimination, EEOC

Primary Purpose

Requires the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission within one year to study Age Discrimination in Employment Act claims pending or filed since 2015 by job applicants who may have been harmed by age discrimination in hiring, then report publicly and to House and Senate labor committees with best-practice recommendations.

Policy Domains

Labor Age Discrimination EEOC

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Older job applicants
  • Age discrimination plaintiffs
  • Employment attorneys
  • Congressional labor committees
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Employment attorneys:
Older job applicants:
Age discrimination plaintiffs:
Congressional labor committees:
Identified Costs
  • EEOC research staff
  • EEOC Chair staff
  • Employers using age-sensitive hiring practices
  • Federal taxpayers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
EEOC Chair staff:
Federal taxpayers:
EEOC research staff:
Employers using age-sensitive hiring practices:

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Sep 19, 2025

Ms. Garcia of Texas (for herself, Ms. Salazar, Mr. Scott …

Sep 19, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.

Sep 19, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Labor
2 mentions across 1 clause
+1 positive -1 negative

Employers using age-sensitive hiring practices, Older job applicants

Positive-direction: Older job applicants

Negative-direction: Employers using age-sensitive hiring practices

Professional Services
2 mentions across 1 clause
+2 positive

Age discrimination plaintiffs, Employment attorneys

Government
2 mentions across 1 clause
-2 negative

EEOC Chair staff, EEOC research staff

Congress
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Congressional labor committees

1/3
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Labor Age Discrimination EEOC

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology