Tyler Clementi Higher Education Anti-Harassment Act of 2025
Summary
What This Bill Does
The Tyler Clementi Higher Education Anti-Harassment Act expands campus safety disclosures and creates an anti-harassment grant program. It amends Higher Education Act disclosure rules so institutional security information includes campus harassment policy and campus crime statistics, with definitions for electronic communication, harassment, and related conduct. Institutions must identify counseling, mental health, and student or employee services for harassment victims or perpetrators, and designate an employee or office responsible for receiving and tracking harassment reports by students, faculty, or staff. The Education Secretary may award competitive grants to institutions, institution-nonprofit partnerships, or same-state consortia to address harassment on covered characteristics, develop prevention programs, train staff, and improve reporting and services. The Secretary must use grantee information to publish evidence-based best practices for combating harassment at institutions of higher education. The bill authorizes $50 million annually for fiscal years 2026 through 2031 and states that existing Title VI, Title IX, Rehabilitation Act, ADA, state, and local remedies remain available.
Who Benefits and How
College students facing harassment benefit because schools must disclose policies, services, reporting offices, and prevention practices. LGBTQ students benefit from a bill named for Tyler Clementi that targets harassment including electronic communication and cyberbullying. Higher education institutions benefit from competitive grants to build anti-harassment programs and services. Campus mental health offices benefit if grant funds support counseling and support systems for victims or perpetrators of harassment.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Education Department grant staff must administer competitive grants and publish evidence-based best-practice reports. College compliance offices must update Clery-style disclosures, policy language, report tracking, and service notifications. Institutions receiving grants must carry out authorized anti-harassment activities and report information to the Department. Federal taxpayers fund the $50 million annual authorization for fiscal years 2026 through 2031.
Key Provisions
- Requires higher education harassment-policy and campus-security disclosures.
- Covers electronic communication and cyberbullying-related harassment.
- Creates competitive Education Department grants for anti-harassment programs.
- Requires a federal evidence-based best-practices report.
- Authorizes $50 million annually for fiscal years 2026 through 2031 and preserves existing civil-rights remedies.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Requires higher education institutions to disclose harassment policies and campus security information covering electronic communication and cyberbullying, creates a competitive anti-harassment grant program for colleges and consortia, directs Education Department best-practice reporting, authorizes $50 million annually for fiscal years 2026 through 2031, and preserves other federal and state civil-rights remedies.
Key Policy Areas
Higher Education, Civil Rights, Campus Safety
Primary Purpose
Requires higher education institutions to disclose harassment policies and campus security information covering electronic communication and cyberbullying, creates a competitive anti-harassment grant program for colleges and consortia, directs Education Department best-practice reporting, authorizes $50 million annually for fiscal years 2026 through 2031, and preserves other federal and state civil-rights remedies.
Policy Domains
Resolution provisions
Identified Gains
- College students facing harassment
- LGBTQ students
- Higher education institutions
- Campus mental health offices
Identified Costs
- Education Department grant staff
- College compliance offices
- Institutions receiving grants
- Federal taxpayers
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
In CommitteeMr. Pocan (for himself, Mr. Amo, Ms. Ansari, Ms. Balint, …
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Introduced in House
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Campus mental health offices, College compliance offices, College students facing harassment
Positive-direction: College students facing harassment, Higher education institutions
Negative-direction: Campus mental health offices, College compliance offices
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology