Chloe Cole Act
Summary
What This Bill Does
The Chloe Cole Act defines and restricts certain gender-transition-related medical interventions for minors through civil liability. The bill defines chemical or surgical mutilation to include puberty blockers, sex hormones, and surgeries intended to alter a child's body to no longer correspond to the child's sex, while carving out exceptions for congenital anomalies, disease, traumatic injury, acute illnesses with high mortality risk, and detransition treatment. Section 3, in the source text, prohibits health care professionals, hospitals, and clinics from participating in those procedures for a child when interstate-commerce hooks, federal territories, D.C., or other jurisdictional triggers are present, unless clear and convincing evidence supports an exception. Section 4 lets an individual subjected as a child, or parents or legal guardians, bring a federal civil action for damages against participating professionals, hospitals, or clinics, including compensatory, economic, noneconomic, and punitive damages; post-enactment violations proven by clear and convincing evidence are strictly liable. Section 5 preserves counseling, mental health referrals, and discussion of adult treatment options when they do not constitute participation.
Who Benefits and How
Parents opposing gender-transition procedures for minors benefit because the bill gives them a federal damages action. Individuals who later challenge childhood procedures benefit from a civil remedy for economic, emotional, and punitive damages. Detransition patients benefit because detransition treatment is excluded from the bill's prohibited-procedure definition. Advocacy organizations opposing pediatric gender-transition care benefit from an enforceable federal liability standard.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Gender-affirming care clinicians face new federal civil liability, strict-liability rules, and burden-of-proof requirements. Hospitals offering pediatric gender-transition services must reassess procedures, documentation, exceptions, and legal exposure. Transgender minors seeking covered care face reduced access when providers avoid procedures covered by the bill. Federal courts must hear damages actions and resolve statutory ambiguities under the bill's construction rules.
Key Provisions
- Defines covered chemical and surgical procedures involving puberty blockers, sex hormones, and surgeries for minors.
- Provides exceptions for congenital anomalies, disease, traumatic injury, acute mortality risk, and detransition treatment.
- Prohibits provider, hospital, or clinic participation when federal jurisdictional triggers are present.
- Creates a private right of action for affected individuals, parents, and legal guardians.
- Requires clear and convincing evidence for exceptions and imposes strict liability for proven post-enactment violations.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Creates a federal civil-liability regime for providers, hospitals, and clinics that perform what the bill defines as chemical or surgical mutilation of children, including puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and specified surgeries, while preserving exceptions for congenital anomalies, disease, injury, acute mortality risks, and detransition treatment, and allowing affected individuals or parents to sue for damages.
Key Policy Areas
Health Care, Civil Liability, Children
Primary Purpose
Creates a federal civil-liability regime for providers, hospitals, and clinics that perform what the bill defines as chemical or surgical mutilation of children, including puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and specified surgeries, while preserving exceptions for congenital anomalies, disease, injury, acute mortality risks, and detransition treatment, and allowing affected individuals or parents to sue for damages.
Policy Domains
Resolution provisions
Identified Gains
- Parents opposing gender-transition procedures
- Individuals challenging childhood procedures
- Detransition patients
- Advocacy organizations opposing pediatric gender-transition care
Identified Costs
- Gender-affirming care clinicians
- Hospitals offering pediatric gender-transition services
- Transgender minors seeking covered care
- Federal courts
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
In CommitteeMr. Onder (for himself, Mr. Carter of Georgia, Mr. Murphy, …
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Introduced in House
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Individuals challenging childhood procedures
Parents opposing gender-transition procedures
Hospitals offering pediatric gender-transition services
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology