HR5483-119

In Committee

Chloe Cole Act

119th Congress Introduced Sep 18, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Chloe Cole Act defines and restricts certain gender-transition-related medical interventions for minors through civil liability. The bill defines chemical or surgical mutilation to include puberty blockers, sex hormones, and surgeries intended to alter a child's body to no longer correspond to the child's sex, while carving out exceptions for congenital anomalies, disease, traumatic injury, acute illnesses with high mortality risk, and detransition treatment. Section 3, in the source text, prohibits health care professionals, hospitals, and clinics from participating in those procedures for a child when interstate-commerce hooks, federal territories, D.C., or other jurisdictional triggers are present, unless clear and convincing evidence supports an exception. Section 4 lets an individual subjected as a child, or parents or legal guardians, bring a federal civil action for damages against participating professionals, hospitals, or clinics, including compensatory, economic, noneconomic, and punitive damages; post-enactment violations proven by clear and convincing evidence are strictly liable. Section 5 preserves counseling, mental health referrals, and discussion of adult treatment options when they do not constitute participation.

Who Benefits and How

Parents opposing gender-transition procedures for minors benefit because the bill gives them a federal damages action. Individuals who later challenge childhood procedures benefit from a civil remedy for economic, emotional, and punitive damages. Detransition patients benefit because detransition treatment is excluded from the bill's prohibited-procedure definition. Advocacy organizations opposing pediatric gender-transition care benefit from an enforceable federal liability standard.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Gender-affirming care clinicians face new federal civil liability, strict-liability rules, and burden-of-proof requirements. Hospitals offering pediatric gender-transition services must reassess procedures, documentation, exceptions, and legal exposure. Transgender minors seeking covered care face reduced access when providers avoid procedures covered by the bill. Federal courts must hear damages actions and resolve statutory ambiguities under the bill's construction rules.

Key Provisions

  • Defines covered chemical and surgical procedures involving puberty blockers, sex hormones, and surgeries for minors.
  • Provides exceptions for congenital anomalies, disease, traumatic injury, acute mortality risk, and detransition treatment.
  • Prohibits provider, hospital, or clinic participation when federal jurisdictional triggers are present.
  • Creates a private right of action for affected individuals, parents, and legal guardians.
  • Requires clear and convincing evidence for exceptions and imposes strict liability for proven post-enactment violations.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Creates a federal civil-liability regime for providers, hospitals, and clinics that perform what the bill defines as chemical or surgical mutilation of children, including puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and specified surgeries, while preserving exceptions for congenital anomalies, disease, injury, acute mortality risks, and detransition treatment, and allowing affected individuals or parents to sue for damages.

Key Policy Areas

Health Care, Civil Liability, Children

Primary Purpose

Creates a federal civil-liability regime for providers, hospitals, and clinics that perform what the bill defines as chemical or surgical mutilation of children, including puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and specified surgeries, while preserving exceptions for congenital anomalies, disease, injury, acute mortality risks, and detransition treatment, and allowing affected individuals or parents to sue for damages.

Policy Domains

Health Care Civil Liability Children

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Parents opposing gender-transition procedures
  • Individuals challenging childhood procedures
  • Detransition patients
  • Advocacy organizations opposing pediatric gender-transition care
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Detransition patients: , ,
Individuals challenging childhood procedures: , ,
Parents opposing gender-transition procedures: , ,
Advocacy organizations opposing pediatric gender-transition care: , ,
Identified Costs
  • Gender-affirming care clinicians
  • Hospitals offering pediatric gender-transition services
  • Transgender minors seeking covered care
  • Federal courts
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Federal courts: , ,
Gender-affirming care clinicians: , ,
Transgender minors seeking covered care: , ,
Hospitals offering pediatric gender-transition services: , ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Sep 18, 2025

Mr. Onder (for himself, Mr. Carter of Georgia, Mr. Murphy, …

Sep 18, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Sep 18, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Health Care Providers
3 mentions across 3 clauses
-3 negative

Gender-affirming care clinicians

Judiciary
3 mentions across 3 clauses
-3 negative

Federal courts

Healthcare Beneficiaries
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Individuals challenging childhood procedures

Low-Income Households
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Parents opposing gender-transition procedures

Healthcare
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Hospitals offering pediatric gender-transition services

Behavioral Health
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Mental health professionals

3/7
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Health Care Civil Liability Children

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology