HR5437-119

Reported

Protection of Lawful Commerce in Stone Slab Products Act

119th Congress Introduced Sep 17, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Stone Slab Products Act creates a liability shield for manufacturers and sellers of stone slab products, including quartz, mineral, crystal, glass, porcelain, stone, ceramic, or similar slab products shipped in interstate or foreign commerce. Congress finds that lawsuits have sought money damages from manufacturers and sellers for silica-dust injuries allegedly caused when third-party fabricators cut, drill, shape, polish, or grind the products in workplaces regulated by federal and state safety laws. The bill's stated purpose is to prohibit civil actions against manufacturers and sellers for injuries caused by respirable silica or other substances arising from third-party fabrication, preserve consumer access to stone slabs, protect the lawful industry, and prevent burdens on interstate and foreign commerce. Section 3 provides that qualified civil actions may not be brought in federal or state court and pending qualified civil actions must be dismissed as soon as practicable after enactment. Section 4 defines fabrication, qualified civil action, qualified product, seller, and state, including territories and political subdivisions.

Who Benefits and How

Stone slab manufacturers benefit from a federal bar on qualified silica-injury suits arising from third-party fabrication. Stone slab sellers benefit because pending and future qualified civil actions against them would be dismissed or prohibited. Countertop retailers benefit from reduced litigation exposure tied to fabrication activities they do not control. Consumers seeking stone slab products benefit indirectly if the bill preserves supply and interstate commerce in those products.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Fabrication workers with silica injuries lose a path to sue manufacturers or sellers for qualified civil actions. Plaintiff attorneys handling stone slab silica cases must see pending qualified actions dismissed. Federal courts must dismiss pending qualified civil actions and reject new covered suits. State courts lose jurisdiction to hear qualified civil actions covered by the federal prohibition.

Key Provisions

  • Prohibits qualified civil actions against stone slab manufacturers and sellers in federal or state court.
  • Requires pending qualified civil actions to be dismissed after enactment.
  • Defines covered injuries as arising from third-party fabrication, including silica or other substance exposure.
  • Defines qualified products to include stone, quartz, mineral, crystal, glass, porcelain, ceramic, or similar slabs in commerce.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Precludes qualified civil actions in federal or state court against manufacturers or sellers of stone slab products for injuries arising from third-party fabrication, requires pending qualified civil actions to be dismissed, and defines fabrication, qualified products, sellers, and covered states and territories.

Key Policy Areas

Civil Litigation, Manufacturing, Workplace Safety

Primary Purpose

Precludes qualified civil actions in federal or state court against manufacturers or sellers of stone slab products for injuries arising from third-party fabrication, requires pending qualified civil actions to be dismissed, and defines fabrication, qualified products, sellers, and covered states and territories.

Policy Domains

Civil Litigation Manufacturing Workplace Safety

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Stone slab manufacturers
  • Stone slab sellers
  • Countertop retailers
  • Consumers seeking stone slab products
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Stone slab sellers: ,
Countertop retailers: ,
Stone slab manufacturers: ,
Consumers seeking stone slab products: ,
Identified Costs
  • Fabrication workers with silica injuries
  • Plaintiff attorneys handling stone slab silica cases
  • Federal courts
  • State courts
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
State courts: ,
Federal courts: ,
Fabrication workers with silica injuries: ,
Plaintiff attorneys handling stone slab silica cases: ,

Legislative Progress

Reported
Introduced Committee Passed
Jun 3, 2026

Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: …

Jun 3, 2026

Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

Sep 17, 2025

Mr. McClintock (for himself and Mr. Biggs of Arizona) introduced …

Sep 17, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Sep 17, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Manufacturing
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Stone slab manufacturers

Retail
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Stone slab sellers

Professional Services
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Plaintiff attorneys handling stone slab silica cases

2/4
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Civil Litigation Manufacturing Workplace Safety

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology