HR5433-119

In Committee

POP Act

119th Congress Introduced Sep 17, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The POP Act targets vertical ownership between health insurers and certain Medicare providers. It makes it unlawful for a person to own, operate, or control both an applicable provider or a management services organization with a management agreement with that provider, and a health insurance issuer. Existing common ownership must be unwound within two years after enactment; acquisitions after enactment must be divested within one year. HHS's Inspector General, DOJ's Antitrust Division, the Federal Trade Commission, or a state attorney general may sue in federal district court. Courts must order cease-and-desist relief, divestiture, and disgorgement of revenue received from health-care services during the violation. The FTC must create a fund and distribute disgorged revenue for the harmed community's health-care needs. Required divestitures must be reported under Hart-Scott-Rodino without regard to normal transaction-size thresholds, and FTC and DOJ may review whether the transaction serves the purposes of the Act.

Who Benefits and How

Medicare patients benefit if separating insurers from covered providers reduces conflicts between coverage decisions and provider ownership incentives. Independent physician practices benefit from limits on insurer ownership of provider operations and management services organizations. State attorneys general benefit from explicit authority to bring federal civil actions against prohibited common ownership. Harmed communities benefit if disgorged revenue is distributed through an FTC-created fund for community health-care needs.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Health insurance issuers with provider ownership must divest providers or insurance assets within statutory deadlines. Provider management services organizations under common ownership with insurers face divestiture pressure. FTC antitrust staff must create the disgorgement fund and review covered divestitures. DOJ Antitrust Division staff must enforce and review ownership separation under the Act.

Key Provisions

  • Bars common ownership or control of applicable Medicare providers and health insurance issuers.
  • Requires divestiture within two years for existing ownership and one year for later acquisitions.
  • Authorizes HHS OIG, DOJ Antitrust, FTC, and state attorneys general to sue in federal court.
  • Requires cease-and-desist orders, divestiture, and disgorgement for violations.
  • Requires Hart-Scott-Rodino reporting for covered divestitures regardless of normal thresholds.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Prohibits common ownership or control of Medicare applicable providers or their management-services organizations and health insurance issuers, requires divestiture within two years for existing ownership or one year for later acquisitions, authorizes HHS OIG, DOJ Antitrust, FTC, and state attorneys general to sue, requires disgorgement for harmed communities, and subjects divestitures to Hart-Scott-Rodino review regardless of thresholds.

Key Policy Areas

Health Care, Antitrust, Medicare

Primary Purpose

Prohibits common ownership or control of Medicare applicable providers or their management-services organizations and health insurance issuers, requires divestiture within two years for existing ownership or one year for later acquisitions, authorizes HHS OIG, DOJ Antitrust, FTC, and state attorneys general to sue, requires disgorgement for harmed communities, and subjects divestitures to Hart-Scott-Rodino review regardless of thresholds.

Policy Domains

Health Care Antitrust Medicare

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Medicare patients
  • Independent physician practices
  • State attorneys general
  • Harmed communities
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Medicare patients:
Harmed communities:
State attorneys general:
Independent physician practices:
Identified Costs
  • Health insurance issuers with provider ownership
  • Provider management services organizations
  • FTC antitrust staff
  • DOJ Antitrust Division staff
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
FTC antitrust staff:
DOJ Antitrust Division staff:
Provider management services organizations:
Health insurance issuers with provider ownership:

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Sep 17, 2025

Ms. Hoyle of Oregon (for herself, Mr. Ryan, Ms. Jayapal, …

Sep 17, 2025

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition …

Sep 17, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
2 mentions across 1 clause
-2 negative

DOJ Antitrust Division staff, FTC antitrust staff

Healthcare Beneficiaries
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Medicare patients

Physicians
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Independent physician practices

State & Local Government
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

State attorneys general

Financial Services
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Health insurance issuers with provider ownership

Health Care Providers
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Provider management services organizations

1/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Health Care Antitrust Medicare

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology