HR5245-119

Introduced

To provide for the management authorities of the Department of State.

119th Congress Introduced Sep 10, 2025

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does
This bill reorganizes and codifies the management structure of the Department of State, establishing six bureaus under the Under Secretary for Management: Administration, Diplomatic Technology, Consular Affairs, Diplomatic Security, Asset Management, and Human Resources. It authorizes appropriations for fiscal years 2026 and 2027 and strengthens authorities related to diplomatic security, consular operations, and foreign mission property oversight.

Who Benefits and How
- Department of State employees and leadership: Gain clearer organizational structure, defined responsibilities, and continued funding authorization
- Government IT and security contractors: Benefit from expanded Bureau of Diplomatic Technology and cybersecurity programs, creating contract opportunities
- Diplomatic Security special agents: Receive expanded law enforcement authorities including arrest powers, search warrants, and protective service responsibilities
- US citizens abroad: May benefit from improved consular services through expanded fee flexibility and inter-agency data sharing for passport/visa processing

Who Bears the Burden and How
- Foreign missions from Communist countries and state sponsors of terrorism: Face new PROHIBITIONS on acquiring US real property that could enhance intelligence capabilities against the US
- All foreign missions in the US: Must notify the State Department 60 days before acquiring or selling property and comply with review procedures
- Other federal agencies with overseas personnel: Must follow direction from State Department Regional Security Officers at overseas posts

Key Provisions
- Establishes the Chief Information Officer for Diplomatic Technology and consolidates IT systems under a new Bureau of Diplomatic Technology
- Grants Diplomatic Security special agents broad law enforcement powers including investigating passport/visa fraud, human trafficking, and authority to carry firearms and make arrests
- Prohibits foreign missions from "covered foreign countries" (Communist and terrorism-sponsoring states) from acquiring US real property that could improve their intelligence capabilities
- Extends special hiring authority for passport services from 3 years to 5 years
- Mandates counter-intelligence training for Diplomatic Security agents at high-threat posts
- Requires 45-day congressional notification before closing diplomatic posts abroad

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Establishes the organizational structure and management authorities of the Department of State, codifying bureau structures, defining responsibilities of key officials, and authorizing appropriations for fiscal years 2026 and 2027.

Who Benefits

  • Department of State officials and employees (clearer organizational structure)
  • Diplomatic Security special agents (expanded law enforcement authorities)
  • Consular services operations (funding flexibility and hiring authority extension)

Who Bears Costs

  • Foreign missions in the US (new property acquisition restrictions for covered countries)
  • Foreign missions from Communist and state sponsor of terrorism countries (real property acquisition prohibited)
  • Office of Consular Systems and Technology staff (organizational transfer)

Key Policy Areas

Government Administration, Foreign Affairs, National Security, Information Technology, Personnel Management

Primary Purpose

Establishes the organizational structure and management authorities of the Department of State, codifying bureau structures, defining responsibilities of key officials, and authorizing appropriations for fiscal years 2026 and 2027.

Policy Domains

Government Administration Foreign Affairs National Security Information Technology Personnel Management

Legislative Strategy

"Codify and reorganize State Department management structure, consolidate IT systems under a single CIO, strengthen diplomatic security authorities, and provide fee flexibility for consular services"

Identified Gains

  • Department of State officials and employees (clearer organizational structure)
  • Diplomatic Security special agents (expanded law enforcement authorities)
  • Consular services operations (funding flexibility and hiring authority extension)
  • Government IT contractors (Bureau of Diplomatic Technology consolidation)

Identified Costs

  • Foreign missions in the US (new property acquisition restrictions for covered countries)
  • Foreign missions from Communist and state sponsor of terrorism countries (real property acquisition prohibited)
  • Office of Consular Systems and Technology staff (organizational transfer)

Legislative Progress

Introduced
Introduced Committee Passed
Sep 10, 2025

Mr. Lawler introduced the following bill; which was referred to …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
43 mentions across 38 clauses
+22 positive -3 negative ?18 uncertain

Bureau of Consular Affairs, Bureau of Diplomatic Security personnel, Bureau of Diplomatic Technology

Positive-direction: Bureau of Consular Affairs, Bureau of Diplomatic Technology, Department of State, Department of State Bureau of Administration, Department of State Bureau of Asset Management, Department of State Bureau of Consular Affairs, Department of State Bureau of Diplomatic Security, Department of State Bureau of Diplomatic Technology, Department of State Bureau of Human Resources, Department of State consular operations, Department of State employees, Department of State management operations, Diplomatic Security Regional Security Officers, Diplomatic Security special agents, Foreign Service personnel, US diplomatic posts abroad, US national security agencies (DoD, FBI)

Negative-direction: Department of State management, Federal agencies with relevant databases

Foreign Entities
5 mentions across 3 clauses
+1 positive -4 negative

All foreign missions in the US, Foreign missions from Communist countries (China, Cuba, North Korea, etc.), Foreign missions from state sponsors of terrorism

Foreign missions in the United States faces effects in multiple directions

Technology
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+3 positive

Government IT contractors, Government IT contractors and vendors, IT and cybersecurity contractors

General Public
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+1 positive -1 negative ?1 uncertain

Organizations and individuals using diplomatic reception rooms, US citizens seeking consular services abroad, US citizens seeking passport and consular services

Positive-direction: US citizens seeking passport and consular services

Negative-direction: Organizations and individuals using diplomatic reception rooms

Criminal Activity
2 mentions across 1 clause
-2 negative

Human trafficking networks, Individuals involved in passport/visa fraud

+1 positive

Training and education providers

Education
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Federal employees' dependents abroad (education)

Investigation And Security Services
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Security contractors and vendors

38/43
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Government Administration
Actor Mappings
"the_secretary"
→ Secretary of State
"the_department"
→ Department of State
"appropriate_congressional_committees"
→ House Committee on Foreign Affairs and Senate Committee on Foreign Relations
Domains
Government Administration Personnel Management
Actor Mappings
"the_secretary"
→ Secretary of State
"the_under_secretary"
→ Under Secretary of State for Management
"chief_medical_officer"
→ Chief Medical Officer
Domains
Government Administration
Actor Mappings
"the_secretary"
→ Secretary of State
"assistant_secretary"
→ Assistant Secretary for Administration
"the_under_secretary"
→ Under Secretary for Management
Domains
Information Technology Cybersecurity
Actor Mappings
"the_secretary"
→ Secretary of State
"the_under_secretary"
→ Under Secretary for Management
"chief_information_officer"
→ Chief Information Officer for Diplomatic Technology
Domains
Immigration Consular Services Information Technology
Actor Mappings
"the_secretary"
→ Secretary of State
"assistant_secretary"
→ Assistant Secretary for Consular Affairs
"the_under_secretary"
→ Under Secretary for Management
Domains
National Security Law Enforcement Counterintelligence
Actor Mappings
"the_secretary"
→ Secretary of State
"assistant_secretary"
→ Assistant Secretary for Diplomatic Security
"the_under_secretary"
→ Under Secretary for Management
Domains
Real Property Foreign Missions Asset Management
Actor Mappings
"the_secretary"
→ Secretary of State
"assistant_secretary"
→ Assistant Secretary for Asset Management
"the_under_secretary"
→ Under Secretary for Management
Domains
Personnel Management Training
Actor Mappings
"director_fsi"
→ Director of the Foreign Service Institute
"the_secretary"
→ Secretary of State
"assistant_secretary"
→ Assistant Secretary for Human Resources
"the_under_secretary"
→ Under Secretary for Management

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

5 terms
"appropriate congressional committees" §1(a)

The Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate

"consular services" §1(b)

Adjudication and issuance of visas; notarial and legalization functions; passport application adjudication; nationality adjudication; citizenship documentation issuance; protection and welfare of US citizens abroad

"Department" §1(c)

The Department of State

"Secretary" §1(d)

The Secretary of State

"covered foreign country" §254(f)

Any Communist country listed in section 620(f) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961; any country designated as state sponsor of terrorism; or any other country engaged in intelligence activities adverse to US national security interests

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology