District of Columbia Cash Bail Reform Act of 2025
Summary
What This Bill Does
The District of Columbia Cash Bail Reform Act of 2025 changes D.C. release rules for two categories of defendants. First, it requires judicial officers to detain each person charged with a crime of violence or dangerous crime before trial and applies related post-conviction detention rules to people convicted of those offenses. It also revises the D.C. Code definitions of burglary and robbery for these detention provisions so the named crimes focus on first-degree offenses, attempts, or offenses involving dangerous weapons. Second, it requires release on a secured appearance bond for people charged with a newly defined public safety or order crime, including failure to appear, obstruction of justice, fleeing law enforcement, rioting, inciting a riot, destruction of property, stalking, certain burglary or robbery offenses, and prior convictions for substantially similar offenses. A surety may arrest a released person and deliver that person to a United States marshal for court review. The bill applies to D.C. offenses charged at least 30 days after enactment.
Who Benefits and How
Crime victims in the District of Columbia and D.C. residents who face repeat-offense risk benefit because defendants charged with violent or dangerous crimes would be detained rather than released under ordinary conditions. Law enforcement officers, court officers, prospective witnesses, and jurors benefit from the rebuttable presumption that no release condition is adequate when probable cause shows threats, intimidation, firearm offenses, or similar conduct. Bail bond companies benefit because secured appearance bonds become mandatory for defined public safety or order crimes, creating more demand for surety services. Prosecutors benefit from clearer detention categories and a statutory presumption for firearm and witness-intimidation cases.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Criminal defendants charged with violent crimes or dangerous crimes lose ordinary pretrial-release options because the judicial officer must order detention for the pretrial period. Defendants charged with public safety or order crimes must secure an appearance bond rather than rely only on unsecured release, increasing cash or surety costs. D.C. jail and detention facilities bear higher population and operating pressure because more defendants must be held before trial or after conviction. D.C. Superior Court judges and clerks must apply the new detention commands, bond procedures, surety-arrest rules, and 30-day applicability date. United States marshals receive people arrested by sureties and must bring them before a judicial officer.
Key Provisions
- Requires mandatory pretrial detention for each person charged in D.C. with a crime of violence or dangerous crime.
- Requires post-conviction detention provisions to cover people convicted of crimes of violence or dangerous crimes.
- Amends burglary and robbery references in the dangerous-crime and crime-of-violence definitions to first-degree, attempted first-degree, or dangerous-weapon offenses.
- Creates a rebuttable safety presumption when probable cause shows threats to law enforcement, court officers, witnesses, or jurors, or specified firearm offenses while under supervision.
- Requires secured appearance bonds for defined public safety or order crimes and authorizes surety arrest followed by marshal delivery and judicial review.
- Applies the amendments to individuals charged with D.C. offenses on or after the date 30 days after enactment.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Rewrites District of Columbia pretrial-release rules by requiring detention for people charged with crimes of violence or dangerous crimes, narrowing burglary and robbery definitions in the detention statute, creating a rebuttable safety presumption for specified threats and firearm conduct, requiring secured appearance bonds for defined public-safety or order offenses, and applying the amendments to D.C. offenses charged 30 days after enactment.
Key Policy Areas
Criminal Justice, District of Columbia, Public Safety
Primary Purpose
Rewrites District of Columbia pretrial-release rules by requiring detention for people charged with crimes of violence or dangerous crimes, narrowing burglary and robbery definitions in the detention statute, creating a rebuttable safety presumption for specified threats and firearm conduct, requiring secured appearance bonds for defined public-safety or order offenses, and applying the amendments to D.C. offenses charged 30 days after enactment.
Policy Domains
Substantive provisions
Identified Gains
- Crime victims in the District of Columbia
- D.C. residents facing repeat-offense risk
- Law enforcement officers
- Court officers
- Prospective witnesses
- Jurors
- Bail bond companies
- D.C. prosecutors
Identified Costs
- Criminal defendants charged with violent crimes
- Defendants charged with public safety offenses
- D.C. jail facilities
- D.C. Superior Court judges
- United States marshals
- D.C. court clerks
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
Passed HouseReceived in the Senate.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …
On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 237 - …
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.R. …
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …
On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 237 - …
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H4805-4806)
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate …
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 879. (consideration: …
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Criminal defendants charged with violent crimes, Defendants charged with public safety offenses, Law enforcement officers
Positive-direction: Law enforcement officers
Negative-direction: Criminal defendants charged with violent crimes, Defendants charged with public safety offenses, United States marshals
Crime victims in the District of Columbia, Prospective witnesses in D.C. cases
Small business defendants relying on unsecured release
On Passage
District of Columbia Cash Bail Reform Act
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "surety"
- → surety on a secured appearance bond
- "marshal"
- → United States marshal
- "judicial_officer"
- → District of Columbia judicial officer
Key Definitions
Terms defined in this bill
A bond backed by a surety or deposited security as defined in the amended D.C. Code.
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology