Affordable HOMES Act
Summary
What This Bill Does
This bill rewrites the federal role for energy conservation standards for manufactured housing. Instead of a direct Department of Energy standard-setting structure under section 413 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, the Energy Secretary may transmit recommendations to the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development for revisions to HUD's preemptive manufactured-housing energy standards. Any recommendation must be based on cost-effectiveness and must consider both life-cycle construction and operating costs.
The bill also requires DOE recommendations to estimate the effect of a proposed standard on the initial purchase price of manufactured homes. DOE must consider factory construction techniques, limitations unique to manufactured homes, HUD climate zones, alternative methods that achieve equivalent or better energy performance, and payback periods for added costs. It strikes the existing subsection that supported direct DOE rulemaking and provides that the May 31, 2022 DOE final rule on manufactured-housing energy conservation standards has no force or effect.
Who Benefits and How
Manufactured home builders benefit from less direct DOE control and from recommendation criteria focused on purchase price, factory techniques, and payback periods. Manufactured home buyers seeking lower upfront prices benefit if standards that increase initial costs are weakened or delayed. HUD manufactured-housing program staff benefit from clearer primacy over preemptive standards under the Housing and Community Development Act. Factory-built housing retailers benefit if lower compliance costs keep inventory prices lower. State manufactured-housing regulators benefit from a clearer federal standard-setting channel through HUD.
Who Bears the Burden and How
DOE energy-efficiency staff lose direct rulemaking authority and must frame any future role as recommendations to HUD. Manufactured home residents can bear higher utility costs if weaker standards reduce energy performance over the life of a home. Energy-efficiency contractors and product suppliers may lose demand tied to the 2022 rule. Climate and conservation advocates bear a policy setback because the bill voids the DOE final rule and narrows the path for stronger standards. HUD standards staff must evaluate any DOE recommendations under the revised criteria.
Key Provisions
- Allows the Energy Secretary to transmit manufactured-housing energy-standard recommendations to HUD instead of directly setting standards.
- Requires recommendations to be based on cost-effectiveness using life-cycle construction and operating costs.
- Requires estimates of initial purchase-price impacts for manufactured homes.
- Requires consideration of factory construction techniques, HUD climate zones, alternatives, and payback periods.
- Strikes the existing DOE rulemaking subsection for manufactured-housing energy standards.
- Provides that the May 31, 2022 DOE manufactured-housing energy conservation standards rule has no force or effect.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Changes federal manufactured-housing energy standards by allowing the Energy Secretary to send cost-effectiveness-based recommendations to HUD, requiring those recommendations to account for purchase-price impacts and factory-built housing constraints, striking the DOE rulemaking subsection, and voiding the 2022 DOE manufactured-housing energy conservation standards rule.
Key Policy Areas
Housing, Energy, Manufactured Housing, Consumer Costs
Primary Purpose
Changes federal manufactured-housing energy standards by allowing the Energy Secretary to send cost-effectiveness-based recommendations to HUD, requiring those recommendations to account for purchase-price impacts and factory-built housing constraints, striking the DOE rulemaking subsection, and voiding the 2022 DOE manufactured-housing energy conservation standards rule.
Policy Domains
House resolution provisions
Identified Gains
- Manufactured home builders
- Manufactured home buyers seeking lower upfront prices
- HUD manufactured-housing program staff
- Factory-built housing retailers
- State manufactured-housing regulators
Identified Costs
- DOE energy-efficiency staff
- Manufactured home residents
- Energy-efficiency contractors
- Energy-efficiency product suppliers
- Climate advocates
- HUD standards staff
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
ReportedReceived; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy …
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to …
The title of the measure was amended. Agreed to without …
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …
On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 263 - …
Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas …
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate …
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 4593, H.R. 5184 and …
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 977. (consideration: …
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Manufactured home builders, Manufactured home buyers seeking lower upfront prices, Manufactured home residents
Positive-direction: Manufactured home builders, Manufactured home buyers seeking lower upfront prices
Negative-direction: Manufactured home residents
DOE energy-efficiency staff, HUD manufactured-housing program staff
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "hud_secretary"
- → Secretary of Housing and Urban Development
- "energy_secretary"
- → Secretary of Energy
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology