HR513-119

In Committee

Offshore Lands Authorities Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Jan 16, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Offshore Lands Authorities Act of 2025 reopens or preserves access to unleased Outer Continental Shelf lands by nullifying several presidential withdrawals. It declares no force or effect for withdrawals covering the Chukchi Sea, Beaufort Sea, North Aleutian Basin, Northern Bering Sea climate resilience areas, Atlantic canyons, Gulf of Mexico, Atlantic, and Pacific areas. It then amends section 12(a) of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to limit future presidential withdrawals. A withdrawal must be transmitted to Congress, may not exceed 150,000 acres or be contiguous with another withdrawal, may not last more than 20 years, and no President may withdraw more than 500,000 acres cumulatively without congressional approval. Before withdrawal, Interior must complete a geophysical and geological mineral resource assessment within the prior five years, assess economic, energy, and national security value in consultation with Commerce, Energy, Defense, and Agriculture, assess expected revenue reductions to Treasury, states, the Land and Water Conservation Fund, and the Historic Preservation Fund, and report to congressional committees. The bill creates expedited joint-resolution disapproval procedures, bars substantially similar reissued withdrawals after disapproval unless later authorized by law, bars judicial review of determinations or omissions, requires agency submission and Congressional Record notice for covered agency actions, and forbids withdrawals conflicting with lease sales scheduled under an approved oil and gas leasing program.

Who Benefits and How

Offshore oil and gas companies benefit because listed Arctic, Atlantic, Gulf, Pacific, and Bering Sea withdrawals lose effect. Coastal states receiving offshore revenue benefit if more lease activity increases allocations under revenue-sharing laws. Federal Treasury revenue offices benefit if offshore leasing and production increase royalty, bonus, or rental receipts. Congressional natural resources committees benefit from reports and expedited disapproval procedures over future withdrawals.

Who Bears the Burden and How

The President must satisfy acreage, duration, cumulative, assessment, reporting, and congressional review limits before withdrawing unleased offshore lands. Interior offshore resource staff must complete mineral resource, economic, energy, national security, and revenue assessments. Environmental organizations lose protection from several existing offshore withdrawal decisions. Coastal communities may face increased spill, industrial, or climate risk if more offshore leasing proceeds.

Key Provisions

  • Repeals the legal effect of specified Arctic, Atlantic, Gulf, Pacific, and Northern Bering Sea offshore withdrawals.
  • Limits future withdrawals to 150,000 acres, 20 years, and 500,000 cumulative acres absent congressional approval.
  • Requires mineral, economic, energy, national security, and revenue assessments before withdrawal.
  • Requires reports to congressional committees and expedited joint-resolution disapproval procedures.
  • Bars judicial review of covered determinations, findings, actions, or omissions.
  • Prohibits withdrawals that conflict with scheduled lease sales under an approved oil and gas leasing program.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Nullifies listed presidential offshore land withdrawals and limits future presidential withdrawals of unleased Outer Continental Shelf lands through acreage, duration, cumulative, assessment, reporting, congressional disapproval, no-judicial-review, and lease-sale restrictions.

Key Policy Areas

Energy, Offshore Drilling, Federal Lands

Primary Purpose

Nullifies listed presidential offshore land withdrawals and limits future presidential withdrawals of unleased Outer Continental Shelf lands through acreage, duration, cumulative, assessment, reporting, congressional disapproval, no-judicial-review, and lease-sale restrictions.

Policy Domains

Energy Offshore Drilling Federal Lands

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Offshore oil and gas companies
  • Coastal states receiving offshore revenue
  • Federal Treasury revenue offices
  • Congressional natural resources committees
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Offshore oil and gas companies:
Federal Treasury revenue offices:
Coastal states receiving offshore revenue:
Congressional natural resources committees:
Identified Costs
  • President of the United States
  • Interior offshore resource staff
  • Environmental organizations
  • Coastal communities
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Coastal communities:
Environmental organizations:
President of the United States:
Interior offshore resource staff:

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
May 20, 2025

Subcommittee Hearings Held

May 13, 2025

Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources.

Jan 16, 2025

Mr. Higgins of Louisiana (for himself, Mr. Hunt, Mr. Weber …

Jan 16, 2025

Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition …

Jan 16, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Oil & Gas
2 mentions across 1 clause
+2 positive

Offshore gas companies, Offshore oil companies

Environment
2 mentions across 1 clause
-2 negative

Coastal communities, Environmental organizations

State & Local Government
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Coastal states receiving offshore revenue

Government
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Interior offshore resource staff

1/3
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Energy Offshore Drilling Federal Lands

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology