HR5005-119

In Committee

Sanctuary Penalty and Public Protection Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Aug 19, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Sanctuary Penalty and Public Protection Act creates a federal database and funding bar for sanctuary jurisdictions. Within 90 days, DHS, acting through ICE, and the Attorney General must jointly develop, publicly post, and update at least quarterly a database of state or local government entities they determine have laws, regulations, policies, or practices that conflict with federal information-sharing rules, harboring or illegal reentry provisions, detainer compliance, state or local arrest authority for certain immigration offenders, or federal interviews of incarcerated individuals about immigration status or suspected crime involvement. Any state or local government entity listed in the database is called a sanctuary jurisdiction. Federal funds made available after enactment may not be obligated or expended with respect to a sanctuary jurisdiction.

Who Benefits and How

ICE enforcement staff benefit from a public database identifying jurisdictions that restrict detainers, information sharing, arrests, or federal interviews. Federal immigration enforcement advocates benefit from a funding penalty tied to state and local sanctuary policies. Jurisdictions cooperating with federal immigration enforcement benefit by avoiding the sanctuary database and funding bar. Congressional oversight committees benefit from quarterly public updates on jurisdictions DHS and DOJ classify as sanctuary jurisdictions.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Sanctuary jurisdictions lose access to federal funds made available after enactment while listed in the database. State government entities must change covered policies or risk public listing and funding prohibition. Local government entities must do the same for law enforcement and jail policies affecting immigration cooperation. DHS and DOJ staff must jointly classify jurisdictions, maintain the database, and update it at least quarterly.

Key Provisions

  • Requires DHS and DOJ to create a sanctuary-jurisdiction database within 90 days.
  • Requires quarterly public updates to the database.
  • Defines covered sanctuary policies involving information sharing, harboring, reentry, detainers, arrests, and federal interviews.
  • Prohibits federal funds from being obligated or expended for listed sanctuary jurisdictions.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Requires DHS and DOJ to publish a quarterly sanctuary-jurisdiction database and prohibits federal funds from being obligated or expended for listed jurisdictions.

Key Policy Areas

Immigration, Federal Grants, Law Enforcement

Primary Purpose

Requires DHS and DOJ to publish a quarterly sanctuary-jurisdiction database and prohibits federal funds from being obligated or expended for listed jurisdictions.

Policy Domains

Immigration Federal Grants Law Enforcement

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • ICE enforcement staff
  • Federal immigration enforcement advocates
  • Jurisdictions cooperating with federal immigration enforcement
  • Congressional oversight committees
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
ICE enforcement staff: ,
Congressional oversight committees: ,
Federal immigration enforcement advocates: ,
Jurisdictions cooperating with federal immigration enforcement: ,
Identified Costs
  • Sanctuary jurisdictions
  • State government entities
  • Local government entities
  • DHS DOJ database staff
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
DHS DOJ database staff: ,
Sanctuary jurisdictions: ,
Local government entities: ,
State government entities: ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Aug 19, 2025

Mr. Roy (for himself, Mr. Weber of Texas, Mr. McCaul, …

Aug 19, 2025

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition …

Aug 19, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
6 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive -4 negative

DHS DOJ database staff, ICE enforcement staff, State government entities

Positive-direction: ICE enforcement staff

Negative-direction: DHS DOJ database staff, State government entities

State & Local Government
4 mentions across 2 clauses
-4 negative

Local government entities, Sanctuary jurisdictions

Nonprofits
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

Federal immigration enforcement advocates

3/3
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Immigration Federal Grants Law Enforcement

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology