HR4988-119

In Committee

Scam Farms Marque and Reprisal Authorization Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Aug 15, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Scam Farms Marque and Reprisal Authorization Act invokes Congress's Article I power over letters of marque and reprisal against cybercrime-linked scam centers. It finds that cybercrime enterprises and coerced labor present an unusual and extraordinary threat to U.S. economic and national security. The President is authorized and requested to commission privately armed and equipped persons or entities, under official letters of marque and reprisal and suitable instructions, to use all reasonably necessary means outside U.S. geographic boundaries to seize the person and property of any individual or foreign government that the President determines is a member of, conspirator with, or responsible through a criminal enterprise involved in cybercrime for an act of aggression against the United States. The President must require a security bond sufficient to ensure execution according to the letter's terms. The bill defines cybercrime to include Computer Fraud and Abuse Act offenses, unauthorized access to national security or personal information, government-computer intrusion, computer fraud, damaging transmissions, password trafficking, pig-butchering scams, ransomware, cryptocurrency theft, and identity theft, and defines criminal enterprise to include a foreign government.

Who Benefits and How

United States cybercrime victims benefit if the commissioned actions deter or disrupt foreign scam centers and cybercrime enterprises. Private security entities benefit from potential presidential commissions under letters of marque and reprisal. Cryptocurrency theft victims benefit if cybercrime-linked property can be targeted outside U.S. territory. National security officials benefit from an unusual tool aimed at cybercrime enterprises treated as aggression against the United States.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Foreign scam center operators face seizure risk for person and property if the President determines they are covered cybercrime actors. Foreign governments tied to cybercrime can be treated as criminal enterprises for purposes of the commission authority. The President must decide whether to issue commissions, write instructions, and set security bond amounts. Privately commissioned entities must post security bonds and execute letters according to their terms and conditions.

Key Provisions

  • Authorizes presidential letters of marque and reprisal against foreign cybercrime-linked persons and property.
  • Allows privately armed and equipped persons or entities to be commissioned for the service.
  • Requires security bonds sufficient to ensure execution under the letter's terms.
  • Defines cybercrime to include CFAA offenses, pig-butchering scams, ransomware, cryptocurrency theft, and identity theft.
  • Includes foreign governments within the criminal enterprise definition.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Authorizes the President to issue letters of marque and reprisal commissioning privately armed persons or entities to seize foreign cybercrime-linked persons and property outside the United States, subject to security bonds.

Key Policy Areas

Cybersecurity, Foreign Affairs, Law Enforcement

Primary Purpose

Authorizes the President to issue letters of marque and reprisal commissioning privately armed persons or entities to seize foreign cybercrime-linked persons and property outside the United States, subject to security bonds.

Policy Domains

Cybersecurity Foreign Affairs Law Enforcement

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • United States cybercrime victims
  • Private security entities
  • Cryptocurrency theft victims
  • National security officials
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Private security entities: ,
National security officials: ,
Cryptocurrency theft victims: ,
United States cybercrime victims: ,
Identified Costs
  • Foreign scam center operators
  • Foreign governments tied to cybercrime
  • President of the United States
  • Privately commissioned entities
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Foreign scam center operators: ,
President of the United States: ,
Privately commissioned entities: ,
Foreign governments tied to cybercrime: ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Aug 15, 2025

Mr. Schweikert introduced the following bill; which was referred to …

Aug 15, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

Aug 15, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Technology
4 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive -2 negative

Foreign scam center operators, United States cybercrime victims

Positive-direction: United States cybercrime victims

Negative-direction: Foreign scam center operators

National Security
4 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive ?2 uncertain

Private security entities, Privately commissioned entities

Financial Services
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

Cryptocurrency theft victims

Government
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

President of the United States

2/3
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Cybersecurity Foreign Affairs Law Enforcement

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology