HR4966-119

In Committee

Stop Price Gouging in Grocery Stores Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Aug 12, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Stop Price Gouging in Grocery Stores Act creates federal rules for retail food store pricing and surveillance technology. Retail food stores may not sell items at grossly excessive prices unless the increase is directly attributable to additional uncontrollable procurement, acquisition, distribution, or provision costs. FTC must issue regulations within 180 days defining markets, grossly excessive prices, and excessive prices, and must consider a 120 percent of average market price benchmark. Retail food stores also may not use surveillance-based price setting, including personal-information-based price adjustments or electronic shelf labels tied to personal information. The bill permits disclosed group discounts and voluntary biometric identity verification under strict notice, retention, sharing, and deletion conditions. Stores using facial recognition must post clear signage at the main entrance. FTC enforces violations as unfair or deceptive acts or practices and unfair methods of competition, states may bring parens patriae suits for injunctions, damages of at least $3,000 per violation, restitution, penalties, and equitable relief, and Congress authorizes $5,000,000 for fiscal year 2025 through September 30, 2032.

Who Benefits and How

Grocery consumers benefit from a federal ban on grossly excessive food prices and personalized surveillance-based price setting. State attorneys general benefit from parens patriae authority to sue retail food stores for violations affecting state residents. Privacy advocates benefit from limits on facial recognition, biometric data, electronic shelf labels, and personal-information-driven prices. FTC enforcement staff benefit from explicit authority and $5,000,000 in authorized implementation funding.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Retail food stores must justify price increases, avoid surveillance-based pricing, post facial-recognition signage, and follow FTC regulations. Grocery chains using electronic shelf labels must avoid personal-information-based price changes except for allowed uniform discounts. Biometric technology vendors face tighter conditions on grocery identity verification, disclosure, data sharing, and deletion. FTC rulemaking staff must define grossly excessive price, market, and excessive price metrics within 180 days.

Key Provisions

  • Prohibits retail food stores from selling items at grossly excessive prices unless cost increases justify the price.
  • Bars surveillance-based price setting using personal information, facial recognition, or electronic shelf labels.
  • Requires clear entrance signage when a retail food store uses facial recognition technology.
  • Provides FTC enforcement and state attorney general civil actions with damages, restitution, penalties, and equitable relief.
  • Authorizes $5,000,000 for fiscal year 2025, available through September 30, 2032.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Prohibits grocery-store grossly excessive pricing and surveillance-based price setting, requires facial-recognition signage, creates FTC and state enforcement, and authorizes $5,000,000 for implementation.

Key Policy Areas

Consumer Protection, Food Retail, Privacy, Antitrust

Primary Purpose

Prohibits grocery-store grossly excessive pricing and surveillance-based price setting, requires facial-recognition signage, creates FTC and state enforcement, and authorizes $5,000,000 for implementation.

Policy Domains

Consumer Protection Food Retail Privacy Antitrust

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Grocery consumers
  • State attorneys general
  • Privacy advocates
  • FTC enforcement staff
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Grocery consumers: , , , , ,
Privacy advocates: , , , , ,
FTC enforcement staff: , , , , ,
State attorneys general: , , , , ,
Identified Costs
  • Retail food stores
  • Grocery chains using electronic shelf labels
  • Biometric technology vendors
  • FTC rulemaking staff
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Retail food stores: , , , , ,
FTC rulemaking staff: , , , , ,
Biometric technology vendors: , , , , ,
Grocery chains using electronic shelf labels: , , , , ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Aug 12, 2025

Ms. Tlaib (for herself, Mr. Casar, Mr. Nadler, Ms. Clarke …

Aug 12, 2025

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in …

Aug 12, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
12 mentions across 6 clauses
+6 positive -6 negative

FTC rulemaking staff, State attorneys general

Positive-direction: State attorneys general

Negative-direction: FTC rulemaking staff

Consumers
6 mentions across 6 clauses
+6 positive

Grocery consumers

Nonprofits
6 mentions across 6 clauses
+6 positive

Privacy advocates

Food & Beverage
6 mentions across 6 clauses
-6 negative

Retail food stores

Technology
6 mentions across 6 clauses
-6 negative

Biometric technology vendors

6/9
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Consumer Protection Food Retail Privacy Antitrust

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology