CLEAR ID Act
Summary
What This Bill Does
The CLEAR ID Act responds to reported incidents in 2025 in which individuals allegedly impersonated ICE officers in Chicago, Philadelphia, Bay County, Sullivan's Island, and Raleigh. The operative rule limits DHS funding for civil immigration enforcement actions. Except for medical necessity or an approved undercover operation, covered immigration officers may not conduct such actions with DHS funds unless they are not wearing masks or facial coverings that hide identity, use only vehicles clearly identifying the involved agency when a vehicle is used, and identify themselves verbally and visibly by showing agency identification, presenting a badge, and wearing a uniform representing the agency. Covered immigration officers include CBP personnel, ICE personnel, and other federal, state, or local personnel authorized by DHS to conduct civil immigration enforcement. Undercover approvals must consider risks of personal injury, property damage, financial loss, reputation damage, civil liability, privacy invasion, interference with privileged relationships, unlawful conduct, and suitability of government participation.
Who Benefits and How
People approached during civil immigration enforcement benefit from visible officer identity, marked vehicles, badges, and uniforms. Immigrant communities benefit if clearer identification reduces fear caused by officer impersonation and masked enforcement. Legitimate ICE officers benefit because impersonators become easier to distinguish from authorized personnel. Local law enforcement agencies benefit if federal immigration operations are less likely to be confused with criminal impersonation.
Who Bears the Burden and How
ICE field teams must adjust mask, identification, uniform, and vehicle practices for civil immigration enforcement actions. CBP personnel assigned to immigration enforcement must follow the same visibility rules when using DHS funds. DHS undercover operation approvers must document risk-based criteria before allowing covered exceptions. State or local officers authorized by DHS must comply with federal identity-disclosure requirements during civil immigration actions.
Key Provisions
- Prohibits DHS funds for civil immigration enforcement unless covered officers are visibly identifiable.
- Requires marked agency vehicles when vehicles are used in official immigration operations.
- Requires officers to identify themselves verbally and visibly with agency identification, badges, and uniforms.
- Allows exceptions for medical necessity and approved undercover operations based on listed risk criteria.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Bars Department of Homeland Security funds from being used for civil immigration enforcement actions unless covered immigration officers are unmasked, use clearly marked agency vehicles when vehicles are used, and identify themselves verbally and visibly with agency identification, badge, and uniform, while preserving exceptions for medical necessity and approved undercover operations.
Key Policy Areas
Immigration, Law Enforcement, Civil Liberties
Primary Purpose
Bars Department of Homeland Security funds from being used for civil immigration enforcement actions unless covered immigration officers are unmasked, use clearly marked agency vehicles when vehicles are used, and identify themselves verbally and visibly with agency identification, badge, and uniform, while preserving exceptions for medical necessity and approved undercover operations.
Policy Domains
Resolution provisions
Identified Gains
- People approached by immigration officers
- Immigrant communities
- Legitimate ICE officers
- Local law enforcement agencies
Identified Costs
- ICE field teams
- CBP enforcement personnel
- DHS undercover approvers
- DHS-authorized local officers
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
In CommitteeReferred to the Subcommittee on Border Security and Enforcement.
Ms. Crockett (for herself, Ms. Dexter, and Ms. Johnson of …
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition …
Introduced in House
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
CBP enforcement personnel, ICE field teams, Legitimate ICE officers
Positive-direction: Legitimate ICE officers
Negative-direction: CBP enforcement personnel, ICE field teams
Immigrant communities, People approached by immigration officers
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology