HR4830-119

In Committee

Uyghur Genocide Accountability and Sanctions Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Aug 1, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Uyghur Genocide Accountability and Sanctions Act is a sanctions, support, documentation, and procurement bill focused on abuses by the People's Republic of China in Xinjiang. It expands Uyghur Human Rights Policy Act reporting beyond persons in Xinjiang to affected groups outside China and adds covered abuses such as systematic rape, coercive abortion, forced sterilization, involuntary contraception, organ-removal trafficking, forced child separation into boarding schools, and forced deportation or refoulement. It makes State Department visa denial mandatory for certain foreign nationals complicit in forced abortion or sterilization atrocities unless a tightly justified national-security, UN-headquarters, or law-enforcement waiver is provided to Congress. It authorizes development-assistance funds for medical care, physical therapy, and psychological support for Uyghur, Kazakh, Kyrgyz, and other oppressed-group survivors outside China, with U.S. funding capped at 50 percent of assistance costs. It directs a cultural-preservation feasibility report and authorizes $2 million annually from fiscal 2026 through 2029 for a Smithsonian Repressed Cultures Preservation Initiative. Treasury, in consultation with State and DOJ, must decide within 60 days whether named entities such as Hikvision, BGI Group, Tiandy, Dahua, China Electronics Technology Group, Uniview, and ByteDance meet sanctions criteria. State must produce a strategy to counter PRC propaganda denying genocide, support documentation of atrocities, assess forced organ harvesting, and report on federal procurement of PRC-origin or PRC-processed seafood. Federal agencies may not contract with persons identified in Uyghur sanctions reports, forced-labor import denials, or PRC forced-labor activity. DOD may not procure PRC-origin or PRC-processed seafood for military dining facilities, and commissaries may not sell PRC-origin seafood products, subject to limited waivers and overseas exceptions.

Who Benefits and How

Uyghur survivor communities benefit from expanded sanctions coverage, medical care, physical therapy, psychological support, and atrocity-documentation assistance. Kazakhs and other oppressed ethnic groups benefit because survivor support and cultural-preservation provisions are not limited to Uyghurs alone. Smithsonian Institution programs benefit from a $2 million annual authorization for a Repressed Cultures Preservation Initiative. U.S. seafood producers benefit if military dining facilities and commissaries shift away from PRC-origin or PRC-processed seafood.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Named Chinese technology companies face Treasury determinations that could place them on the OFAC specially designated nationals list. Executive agency procurement officers must avoid contracts with listed persons, forced-labor suppliers, and entities facilitating Xinjiang abuses. Defense Commissary Agency officials must remove or waive PRC-origin seafood sales and assess compliance. State Department human rights offices must produce visa-waiver notices, survivor-support reports, propaganda strategy, atrocity documentation support, organ-harvesting strategy, and seafood procurement reports.

Key Provisions

  • Expands Uyghur Human Rights Policy Act sanctions reporting to more abuses and affected groups inside Xinjiang and abroad.
  • Requires visa denial rules, waiver notices, and congressional information on forced abortion or sterilization complicity.
  • Authorizes survivor support and $2 million annually for a Smithsonian Repressed Cultures Preservation Initiative.
  • Requires Treasury sanctions determinations for named Chinese surveillance, genetics, technology, and platform companies.
  • Bars federal contracts and DOD seafood procurement involving listed abusers, forced-labor goods, and PRC-origin seafood sources.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Expands Uyghur Human Rights Policy Act sanctions to abuses against Uyghurs and other targeted groups inside Xinjiang and abroad, tightens visa denial for officials complicit in forced abortion or sterilization atrocities, authorizes State Department survivor support and Smithsonian cultural preservation funding, requires Treasury sanctions determinations for named Chinese surveillance and technology companies, directs State propaganda, atrocity-documentation, organ-harvesting, and seafood-procurement reports, and bars federal contracts, military dining procurement, and commissary sales involving listed forced-labor or PRC-origin seafood sources.

Key Policy Areas

Human Rights, China, Sanctions

Primary Purpose

Expands Uyghur Human Rights Policy Act sanctions to abuses against Uyghurs and other targeted groups inside Xinjiang and abroad, tightens visa denial for officials complicit in forced abortion or sterilization atrocities, authorizes State Department survivor support and Smithsonian cultural preservation funding, requires Treasury sanctions determinations for named Chinese surveillance and technology companies, directs State propaganda, atrocity-documentation, organ-harvesting, and seafood-procurement reports, and bars federal contracts, military dining procurement, and commissary sales involving listed forced-labor or PRC-origin seafood sources.

Policy Domains

Human Rights China Sanctions

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Uyghur survivor communities
  • Kazakh exile communities
  • Smithsonian Institution programs
  • U.S. seafood producers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
U.S. seafood producers: , , , , , , , , , ,
Kazakh exile communities: , , , , , , , , , ,
Uyghur survivor communities: , , , , , , , , , ,
Smithsonian Institution programs: , , , , , , , , , ,
Identified Costs
  • Named Chinese technology companies
  • Executive agency procurement officers
  • Defense Commissary Agency officials
  • State Department human rights offices
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Named Chinese technology companies: , , , , , , , , , ,
Defense Commissary Agency officials: , , , , , , , , , ,
Executive agency procurement officers: , , , , , , , , , ,
State Department human rights offices: , , , , , , , , , ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Aug 1, 2025

Mr. Smith of New Jersey (for himself, Mr. Moolenaar, and …

Aug 1, 2025

Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition …

Aug 1, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
33 mentions across 11 clauses
-33 negative

Defense Commissary Agency officials, Executive agency procurement officers, State Department human rights offices

Civil Liberties
22 mentions across 11 clauses
+22 positive

Kazakh exile communities, Uyghur survivor communities

Museums & Cultural Institutions
11 mentions across 11 clauses
+11 positive

Smithsonian Institution programs

Fishing & Forestry
11 mentions across 11 clauses
+11 positive

U.S. seafood producers

Technology
11 mentions across 11 clauses
-11 negative

Named Chinese technology companies

12/13
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Human Rights China Sanctions

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology