Uyghur Genocide Accountability and Sanctions Act of 2025
Summary
What This Bill Does
The Uyghur Genocide Accountability and Sanctions Act is a sanctions, support, documentation, and procurement bill focused on abuses by the People's Republic of China in Xinjiang. It expands Uyghur Human Rights Policy Act reporting beyond persons in Xinjiang to affected groups outside China and adds covered abuses such as systematic rape, coercive abortion, forced sterilization, involuntary contraception, organ-removal trafficking, forced child separation into boarding schools, and forced deportation or refoulement. It makes State Department visa denial mandatory for certain foreign nationals complicit in forced abortion or sterilization atrocities unless a tightly justified national-security, UN-headquarters, or law-enforcement waiver is provided to Congress. It authorizes development-assistance funds for medical care, physical therapy, and psychological support for Uyghur, Kazakh, Kyrgyz, and other oppressed-group survivors outside China, with U.S. funding capped at 50 percent of assistance costs. It directs a cultural-preservation feasibility report and authorizes $2 million annually from fiscal 2026 through 2029 for a Smithsonian Repressed Cultures Preservation Initiative. Treasury, in consultation with State and DOJ, must decide within 60 days whether named entities such as Hikvision, BGI Group, Tiandy, Dahua, China Electronics Technology Group, Uniview, and ByteDance meet sanctions criteria. State must produce a strategy to counter PRC propaganda denying genocide, support documentation of atrocities, assess forced organ harvesting, and report on federal procurement of PRC-origin or PRC-processed seafood. Federal agencies may not contract with persons identified in Uyghur sanctions reports, forced-labor import denials, or PRC forced-labor activity. DOD may not procure PRC-origin or PRC-processed seafood for military dining facilities, and commissaries may not sell PRC-origin seafood products, subject to limited waivers and overseas exceptions.
Who Benefits and How
Uyghur survivor communities benefit from expanded sanctions coverage, medical care, physical therapy, psychological support, and atrocity-documentation assistance. Kazakhs and other oppressed ethnic groups benefit because survivor support and cultural-preservation provisions are not limited to Uyghurs alone. Smithsonian Institution programs benefit from a $2 million annual authorization for a Repressed Cultures Preservation Initiative. U.S. seafood producers benefit if military dining facilities and commissaries shift away from PRC-origin or PRC-processed seafood.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Named Chinese technology companies face Treasury determinations that could place them on the OFAC specially designated nationals list. Executive agency procurement officers must avoid contracts with listed persons, forced-labor suppliers, and entities facilitating Xinjiang abuses. Defense Commissary Agency officials must remove or waive PRC-origin seafood sales and assess compliance. State Department human rights offices must produce visa-waiver notices, survivor-support reports, propaganda strategy, atrocity documentation support, organ-harvesting strategy, and seafood procurement reports.
Key Provisions
- Expands Uyghur Human Rights Policy Act sanctions reporting to more abuses and affected groups inside Xinjiang and abroad.
- Requires visa denial rules, waiver notices, and congressional information on forced abortion or sterilization complicity.
- Authorizes survivor support and $2 million annually for a Smithsonian Repressed Cultures Preservation Initiative.
- Requires Treasury sanctions determinations for named Chinese surveillance, genetics, technology, and platform companies.
- Bars federal contracts and DOD seafood procurement involving listed abusers, forced-labor goods, and PRC-origin seafood sources.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Expands Uyghur Human Rights Policy Act sanctions to abuses against Uyghurs and other targeted groups inside Xinjiang and abroad, tightens visa denial for officials complicit in forced abortion or sterilization atrocities, authorizes State Department survivor support and Smithsonian cultural preservation funding, requires Treasury sanctions determinations for named Chinese surveillance and technology companies, directs State propaganda, atrocity-documentation, organ-harvesting, and seafood-procurement reports, and bars federal contracts, military dining procurement, and commissary sales involving listed forced-labor or PRC-origin seafood sources.
Key Policy Areas
Human Rights, China, Sanctions
Primary Purpose
Expands Uyghur Human Rights Policy Act sanctions to abuses against Uyghurs and other targeted groups inside Xinjiang and abroad, tightens visa denial for officials complicit in forced abortion or sterilization atrocities, authorizes State Department survivor support and Smithsonian cultural preservation funding, requires Treasury sanctions determinations for named Chinese surveillance and technology companies, directs State propaganda, atrocity-documentation, organ-harvesting, and seafood-procurement reports, and bars federal contracts, military dining procurement, and commissary sales involving listed forced-labor or PRC-origin seafood sources.
Policy Domains
Resolution provisions
Identified Gains
- Uyghur survivor communities
- Kazakh exile communities
- Smithsonian Institution programs
- U.S. seafood producers
Identified Costs
- Named Chinese technology companies
- Executive agency procurement officers
- Defense Commissary Agency officials
- State Department human rights offices
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
In CommitteeMr. Smith of New Jersey (for himself, Mr. Moolenaar, and …
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition …
Introduced in House
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Defense Commissary Agency officials, Executive agency procurement officers, State Department human rights offices
Kazakh exile communities, Uyghur survivor communities
Smithsonian Institution programs
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology