HR4805-119

In Committee

WINGS Act

119th Congress Introduced Jul 29, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The WINGS Act directs the VA Secretary to study the long-term physiological and psychological effects of military aviation on military aviators. The required study must examine cumulative flight hours, G-force exposure, traumatic brain injury, sub-concussive trauma, cognitive impairment, depression, anxiety, PTSD, suicide risk, neurodegenerative conditions such as chronic traumatic encephalopathy, ALS, and Parkinson's disease, cockpit factors such as helmet design, oxygen systems, and flight suit pressurization, current screening and diagnostic procedures, and recommended monitoring, prevention, and treatment improvements. VA must consult the Defense Secretary, military department Surgeons General, the Defense Health Agency Director, and academic institutions or federally funded research and development centers with aviation medicine, neuroscience, and psychiatry expertise. VA must also establish a centralized Military Aviator Neurohealth Registry with anonymized voluntary health data, flight exposure metrics, health outcomes tracked over time, and longitudinal follow-up.

Who Benefits and How

Military aviator veterans benefit because VA must study brain injury, mental health, suicide risk, neurodegenerative disease, and cockpit exposure patterns specific to their service. Current military aviators benefit indirectly if the study leads to better screening, prevention, monitoring, and treatment for aviation-related trauma. Veterans health researchers benefit from a centralized neurohealth registry with anonymized flight exposure and outcome data. Congressional veterans committees benefit from interim and final reports on the health consequences of high-performance military aviation.

Who Bears the Burden and How

The Department of Veterans Affairs must run a longitudinal study, build the registry, consult expert agencies, and report to Congress. Defense Health Agency officials must coordinate with VA on military aviation medical data and expertise. Military department Surgeons General must support consultation on aviator health, flight exposure, and screening practices. Military aviators who volunteer data may face privacy and participation decisions around registry inclusion.

Key Provisions

  • Requires a longitudinal VA study of military flight operations, G-force exposure, brain health, and mental health.
  • Creates a voluntary Military Aviator Neurohealth Registry with anonymized health, exposure, outcome, and follow-up data.
  • Requires consultation with the Defense Secretary, military Surgeons General, Defense Health Agency, and expert research institutions.
  • Requires an interim report within one year and a final report within three years.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Requires the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to conduct a comprehensive longitudinal study of military aviation, high-performance flight, and G-force exposure on military aviators' brain health and mental health, create a voluntary Military Aviator Neurohealth Registry, consult Defense Department medical leaders and research institutions, and report interim findings within one year and final findings within three years.

Key Policy Areas

Veterans, Military Health, Medical Research

Primary Purpose

Requires the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to conduct a comprehensive longitudinal study of military aviation, high-performance flight, and G-force exposure on military aviators' brain health and mental health, create a voluntary Military Aviator Neurohealth Registry, consult Defense Department medical leaders and research institutions, and report interim findings within one year and final findings within three years.

Policy Domains

Veterans Military Health Medical Research

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Military aviator veterans
  • Current military aviators
  • Veterans health researchers
  • Congressional veterans committees
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Current military aviators:
Military aviator veterans:
Veterans health researchers:
Congressional veterans committees:
Identified Costs
  • Department of Veterans Affairs
  • Defense Health Agency
  • Military Surgeons General
  • Registry participants
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Defense Health Agency:
Registry participants:
Military Surgeons General:
Department of Veterans Affairs:

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Oct 22, 2025

Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.

Jul 29, 2025

Mrs. Kiggans of Virginia (for herself and Ms. Goodlander) introduced …

Jul 29, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Veterans' Affairs.

Jul 29, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Military
2 mentions across 1 clause
+1 positive -1 negative

Current military aviators, Military Surgeons General

Positive-direction: Current military aviators

Negative-direction: Military Surgeons General

Veterans
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Military aviator veterans

Research & Science
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Veterans health researchers

Government
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Department of Veterans Affairs

Defense
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Defense Health Agency

1/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Veterans Military Health Medical Research

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology