HR4801-119

Reported

Unleashing AI Innovation in Financial Services Act

119th Congress Introduced Jul 29, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

This bill creates an AI testing pathway for regulated financial entities. It defines an AI test project as a financial product or service under a financial regulator's jurisdiction that substantially uses artificial intelligence and is or may be subject to federal regulation or statute. Covered regulators include federal banking agencies, the Securities and Exchange Commission for broker-dealers, investment companies, investment advisers, clearing agencies, nationally recognized statistical rating organizations, and other SEC-regulated institutions, plus other listed financial regulators.

Each financial regulatory agency must establish or identify an AI Innovation Lab. A regulated entity may apply to carry out an AI test project through the lab by describing the project, identifying a regulation it wants waived or modified, proposing an alternative compliance strategy, explaining why the alternative is essential, and identifying consumer-protection and risk-mitigation measures. Agencies may approve applications subject to conditions and time limits, monitor projects, revoke approvals, and report to Congress on use of the program.

Who Benefits and How

Banks using artificial intelligence benefit from a formal channel to test AI products with modified compliance obligations. Broker-dealers, investment advisers, investment companies, clearing agencies, and rating organizations benefit from a regulator-supervised path for AI experiments. Financial technology companies partnering with regulated entities benefit from clearer regulatory expectations. AI compliance teams benefit from a process for alternative compliance strategies. Consumers may benefit if labs support safer testing of fraud detection, underwriting, customer service, or risk-management tools.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Financial regulatory agency staff must create or identify AI Innovation Labs, design application forms, review alternative compliance strategies, set consumer-protection conditions, monitor tests, and report to Congress. Regulated financial entities must prepare applications, document risk controls, and comply with approval conditions. Consumer protection advocates bear a monitoring burden because waived or modified rules may affect financial customers. Agency enforcement staff must decide when unnecessary or unduly burdensome regulation should be relaxed and when approval should be revoked.

Key Provisions

  • Defines AI test project and appropriate financial regulatory agency.
  • Requires each financial regulatory agency to establish or identify an AI Innovation Lab.
  • Allows regulated entities to apply for AI test projects with waived or modified regulatory obligations.
  • Requires applications to include alternative compliance strategies and consumer-protection measures.
  • Provides agency oversight, conditions, revocation authority, and congressional reporting.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Requires financial regulatory agencies to establish or identify AI Innovation Labs where regulated entities can apply to test AI financial products or services with approved alternative compliance strategies, time-limited waivers or modifications, consumer-protection conditions, and agency reporting to Congress.

Key Policy Areas

Financial Regulation, Artificial Intelligence, Regulatory Sandboxes, Consumer Protection

Primary Purpose

Requires financial regulatory agencies to establish or identify AI Innovation Labs where regulated entities can apply to test AI financial products or services with approved alternative compliance strategies, time-limited waivers or modifications, consumer-protection conditions, and agency reporting to Congress.

Policy Domains

Financial Regulation Artificial Intelligence Regulatory Sandboxes Consumer Protection

House resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Banks using artificial intelligence
  • Broker-dealers testing AI tools
  • Investment advisers testing AI tools
  • Financial technology companies
  • AI compliance teams
  • Consumers using financial products
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
AI compliance teams: ,
Financial technology companies: ,
Broker-dealers testing AI tools: ,
Consumers using financial products: ,
Banks using artificial intelligence: ,
Investment advisers testing AI tools: ,
Identified Costs
  • Financial regulatory agency staff
  • Regulated financial entities
  • Consumer protection advocates
  • Agency enforcement staff
  • Congressional financial services staff
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Agency enforcement staff: ,
Regulated financial entities: ,
Consumer protection advocates: ,
Financial regulatory agency staff: ,
Congressional financial services staff: ,

Legislative Progress

Reported
Introduced Committee Passed
May 13, 2026

Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: …

May 13, 2026

Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

Jul 29, 2025

Mr. Hill of Arkansas (for himself, Mr. Torres of New …

Jul 29, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

Jul 29, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Finance
5 mentions across 2 clauses
+3 positive -1 negative ?1 uncertain

Banks using artificial intelligence, Broker-dealers testing AI tools, Consumer protection advocates

Positive-direction: Banks using artificial intelligence, Broker-dealers testing AI tools, Investment advisers testing AI tools

Negative-direction: Consumer protection advocates

Government
4 mentions across 2 clauses
+1 positive -1 negative ?2 uncertain

Congressional financial services staff, Federal banking agency staff, Financial regulatory agency staff

Positive-direction: Congressional financial services staff

Negative-direction: Financial regulatory agency staff

2/3
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Financial Regulation Artificial Intelligence Regulatory Sandboxes Consumer Protection
Actor Mappings
"sec"
→ Securities and Exchange Commission
"fdic"
→ Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology