HR4755-119

In Committee

LEO K9 Protection Act

119th Congress Introduced Jul 25, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The LEO K9 Protection Act updates protections for police animals and medical response for injured police dogs. It amends 18 U.S.C. 1368 so a person who harms a covered police animal with a deadly or dangerous weapon during the prohibited conduct can be fined or imprisoned for up to 15 years. The bill defines police animal as a dog or horse serving a federal agency in any branch, a state, county, or local agency assisting a federal agency, or the Department of Defense in an official military capacity, where the animal is used for detecting criminal activity, enforcing laws, apprehending offenders, detecting flammable materials, investigating fires, finding missing people, disaster rescue, drowning victim recovery, or military duties. The criminal section does not apply to a person acting in good faith to provide emergency veterinary care. Separately, within 180 days DOT, through the NHTSA Office of Emergency Medical Services Initiatives, must publish guidance for EMS personnel to care for police dogs injured on official duty, drawing on DHS, DOD, Canine Tactical Combat Casualty Care, and other federal resources and consulting veterinarians as needed. Within 240 days DOT must issue regulations ensuring injured police dogs may be transported to veterinary facilities when no person needs medical attention or transport, and paramedics or EMTs may provide emergency care at the scene or during transport.

Who Benefits and How

Police dog handlers benefit from stronger criminal penalties and clearer emergency care pathways for injured working dogs. Federal law enforcement agencies benefit from broader protection for dogs and horses used in detection, apprehension, fire investigation, rescue, and military work. Emergency medical services personnel benefit from DOT guidance clarifying when they may treat or transport injured police dogs. Police dogs benefit from regulated access to emergency care and veterinary transport when no human patient needs the ambulance.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Defendants who harm police animals with deadly or dangerous weapons face up to 15 years imprisonment. Transportation Secretary and NHTSA EMS staff must publish guidance and promulgate regulations within statutory deadlines. EMS agencies must adjust protocols for police dog treatment and transport when regulations are issued. Veterinary clinics may need to coordinate with EMS agencies receiving injured police dogs.

Key Provisions

  • Increases penalties for harming covered police animals with a deadly or dangerous weapon to up to 15 years.
  • Defines police animals to include dogs or horses serving federal, assisting state or local, or military duties.
  • Protects good-faith emergency veterinary care from the criminal provision.
  • Requires DOT guidance within 180 days for EMS care of injured police dogs.
  • Requires DOT regulations within 240 days allowing EMS care and veterinary transport when no person needs transport.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Raises federal criminal exposure for harming law-enforcement animals with a deadly or dangerous weapon to up to 15 years, defines covered police animals to include dogs or horses serving federal agencies, assisting state or local agencies, or official military duties, excludes good-faith emergency veterinary care, and requires DOT guidance and regulations allowing EMS care and transport for injured police dogs when no person needs transport.

Key Policy Areas

Law Enforcement, Emergency Medical Services, Animal Services

Primary Purpose

Raises federal criminal exposure for harming law-enforcement animals with a deadly or dangerous weapon to up to 15 years, defines covered police animals to include dogs or horses serving federal agencies, assisting state or local agencies, or official military duties, excludes good-faith emergency veterinary care, and requires DOT guidance and regulations allowing EMS care and transport for injured police dogs when no person needs transport.

Policy Domains

Law Enforcement Emergency Medical Services Animal Services

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Police dog handlers
  • Federal law enforcement agencies
  • Emergency medical services personnel
  • Police dogs
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Police dogs: , ,
Police dog handlers: , ,
Federal law enforcement agencies: , ,
Emergency medical services personnel: , ,
Identified Costs
  • Defendants harming police animals
  • Transportation Secretary
  • NHTSA EMS staff
  • EMS agencies
  • Veterinary clinics
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
EMS agencies: , ,
NHTSA EMS staff: , ,
Veterinary clinics: , ,
Transportation Secretary: , ,
Defendants harming police animals: , ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Jul 25, 2025

Mr. Bean of Florida (for himself and Mr. Mills) introduced …

Jul 25, 2025

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition …

Jul 25, 2025

Introduced in House

Jul 21, 2025

Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H3481)

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Law Enforcement
9 mentions across 3 clauses
+6 positive -3 negative

Defendants harming police animals, Federal law enforcement agencies, Police dog handlers

Positive-direction: Federal law enforcement agencies, Police dog handlers

Negative-direction: Defendants harming police animals

Healthcare
3 mentions across 3 clauses
?3 uncertain

Emergency medical services personnel

Animal Services
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+3 positive

Police dogs

Government
3 mentions across 3 clauses
-3 negative

Transportation Secretary

Emergency Services
3 mentions across 3 clauses
-3 negative

EMS agencies

Veterinary Services
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+3 positive

Veterinary clinics

3/5
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Law Enforcement Emergency Medical Services Animal Services

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology