HR4736-119

In Committee

No Chinese Cars Act

119th Congress Introduced Jul 23, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The No Chinese Cars Act amends title III of the Trade Act of 1974. It lets the U.S. Trade Representative take section 301 actions not only against the country whose practices are the basis for action, but also against passenger motor vehicles produced in another foreign country by a firm from the section 301 country when the relevant good is already subject to an existing section 301 duty, and by a firm of the People's Republic of China, Russia, Iran, or North Korea. Covered motor vehicles include internal-combustion vehicles, hybrid vehicles, and electric vehicles that require no further manufacturing operations other than readily attachable components or minor finishing. A firm includes a firm or subsidiary headquartered in or controlled by the relevant country. Before USTR modifies or terminates a section 301 action taken on this basis, it must consult with the petitioner and domestic industry representatives and give affected persons a chance to present views, including a public hearing on request. USTR may also take additional section 301 action if doing so maintains or enhances effectiveness. The amendments apply to presidential section 301 actions taken before, on, or after enactment.

Who Benefits and How

Domestic automakers benefit from expanded section 301 tools against Chinese or other covered foreign firms producing cars through third countries. U.S. auto workers benefit if broader trade actions reduce tariff-circumvention pressure from imported covered vehicles. Domestic automotive suppliers benefit from consultation rights before USTR weakens or terminates covered actions. Trade petitioners benefit from required consultation and hearing opportunities before modifications or terminations.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Chinese automakers and covered subsidiaries face expanded exposure to section 301 duties even when production occurs in another country. Russian, Iranian, and North Korean firms face similar exposure for covered passenger motor vehicles. U.S. Trade Representative must define covered firms, consult industry, hold requested hearings, and justify modifications. U.S. vehicle consumers may face higher prices if expanded section 301 duties raise import costs.

Key Provisions

  • Expands section 301 actions to passenger motor vehicles made in third countries by covered firms.
  • Defines covered passenger vehicles to include internal-combustion, hybrid, and electric vehicles.
  • Defines covered firms to include subsidiaries headquartered in or controlled by listed countries.
  • Requires USTR consultation and hearing opportunities before modifying or terminating covered actions.
  • Applies the amendments to section 301 presidential actions before, on, or after enactment.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Expands Trade Act section 301 authority so USTR can apply actions against passenger motor vehicles made in third countries by firms tied to a country already subject to section 301 duties and by firms of China, Russia, Iran, or North Korea, requires consultation and hearing opportunities before modifying or terminating those actions, and applies the authority retroactively, currently, and prospectively.

Key Policy Areas

Trade, Automotive, China

Primary Purpose

Expands Trade Act section 301 authority so USTR can apply actions against passenger motor vehicles made in third countries by firms tied to a country already subject to section 301 duties and by firms of China, Russia, Iran, or North Korea, requires consultation and hearing opportunities before modifying or terminating those actions, and applies the authority retroactively, currently, and prospectively.

Policy Domains

Trade Automotive China

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Domestic automakers
  • U.S. auto workers
  • Automotive suppliers
  • Trade petitioners
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Trade petitioners:
U.S. auto workers:
Domestic automakers:
Automotive suppliers:
Identified Costs
  • Chinese automakers
  • Russian automakers
  • Iranian automakers
  • North Korean automakers
  • U.S. Trade Representative
  • Vehicle consumers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Vehicle consumers:
Chinese automakers:
Iranian automakers:
Russian automakers:
North Korean automakers:
U.S. Trade Representative:

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Jul 23, 2025

Ms. Stevens introduced the following bill; which was referred to …

Jul 23, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

Jul 23, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Automotive
4 mentions across 1 clause
+3 positive -1 negative

Automotive suppliers, Chinese automakers, Domestic automakers

Positive-direction: Automotive suppliers, Domestic automakers, U.S. auto workers

Negative-direction: Chinese automakers

Trade
1 mention across 1 clause
?1 uncertain

Trade petitioners

Government
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

U.S. Trade Representative

Consumers
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Vehicle consumers

1/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Trade Automotive China

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology